From: Strength and Durability Evaluation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete
Reference | % of target compressive strength (MPa) | Flexural strength (MPa) | Split tensile (MPa) | Elasticity (GPa) | w/c ratio | Aggregate source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mix 1,2,5 Current studyb | 93.8 (50) | 6.99 | 3.48 | 27 | 0.40 | Recycling facility |
De Brito and Saikia (2013)b | 88 (N/A) | 5.0 | 3.3 | 26.7 | 0.50 | C and D Waste |
Vivian A. Ulloa et al. (2013)a | Â | C and D Waste | ||||
–(31.4) | X | 0.51 | 6.1 % Abs- Demolition of old concrete structure | |||
–(26) | 0.61 | |||||
–(36.7) | X | 0.51 | 5.8 % Abs | |||
–(29.5) | 0.62 | |||||
–(42.9) | X | 0.45 | 3.9 % Abs | |||
–(37.7) | 0.54 | |||||
–(38.7) | X | 0.4 | 4.5 % Abs | |||
–(31.4) | 0.5 | |||||
–(37) | X | 0.43 | 4.7 % Abs | |||
–(31.2) | 0.56 | |||||
Abdelfatah et al. (2011)b | 85.7 (42) | X | X | X | 0.40 | Old concrete with known strength |
Malešev et al. (2010)a | 91.3 (50) | 5.2 | 2.78 | 29.1 | 0.513 | Crushed laboratory test cubes |
Tabsh and Abdelfatah (2009)b | 92 (50) | X | 4 | X | 0.40 | Old concrete with known strength |
Corinaldesi and Moriconi (2009)b | 89 (28) | X | 1.45 | 27 | 0.4 | Rubble Recycling Plant |
Yang et al. (2008) a—G1 | 90 (36.0) | 3.84 | 3.49 | 29.22 | 0.42 | Old concrete with unknown strength G1—SG 2.53—1.9 % Abs G3—SG 2.4—6.2 % Abs |
Yang et al. (2008)a—G3 | 73.75 (29.5) | 3.20 | 2.56 | 23.72 | 0.42 | |
Rahal (2007)a | 93 (50) | X | X | 29.5 | 0.6 | Field demolished concrete |
Etxeberria et al. (2007)b | 93.3 (30) | X | 2.72 | 27.76 | 0.52 | Selected and processed for the study |
Etxeberria et al. (2007)a | 93.3 (28) | X | 2.72 | 27.76 | 0.50 | C and D Waste |
78.3 (47) | Â | 0.50 | C and D Waste | |||
85(51) | 0.43 | |||||
93.3(56) | 0.40 | |||||
93.3(56) | 0.40 | |||||
66.7(40) | 0.52 | |||||
Limbachiya et al. (2004)a | 94 (35) | 4.5 | X | 25 | 0.6 | C and D Waste |
Katz (2003)b | 77.46 (26.8) | 5.4 | 3.1 | 11.3 | 0.60 | Old concrete with known strength |