Table 3 Comparisons between the estimated and experimental values.
From: Effective Prediction of Thermal Conductivity of Concrete Using Neural Network Method
Researchers | Data no. | Concrete thermal conductivity (W/m K) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Measured | Estimated by the target 0.01 network | Estimated by the target 0.005 network | ||
Harmathy (1983) | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 (0.1) | 0.3 (0.0) |
2 | 0.7 | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.1) | |
3 | 0.9 | 1.0 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.1) | |
4 | 1.2 | 1.2 (0.0) | 1.1 (0.0) | |
5 | 1.3 | 1.5 (0.2) | 1.4 (0.1) | |
6 | 1.5 | 1.4 (0.1) | 1.3 (0.1) | |
Yamazaki et al. (1995) | 7 | 1.0 | 1.0 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.1) |
8 | 1.3 | 1.3 (0.0) | 1.3 (0.0) | |
Khan et al. (1998) | 9 | 1.6 | 1.7 (0.1) | 1.7 (0.1) |
10 | 1.8 | 1.8 (0.0) | 1.7 (0.1) | |
Lie and Kodur (1996) | 11 | 1.0 | 1.1 (0.1) | 1.0 (0.0) |
12 | 1.2 | 1.3 (0.1) | 1.2 (0.0) | |
Van Geem et al. (1997) | 13 | 1.8 | 1.9 (0.1) | 1.9 (0.1) |
14 | 1.9 | 1.8 (0.1) | 1.9 (0.0) | |
15 | 2.0 | 1.9 (0.1) | 2.0 (0.0) | |
16 | 2.1 | 2.2 (0.1) | 2.1 (0.0) | |
Kodur and Sultan (2003) | 17 | 1.4 | 1.5 (0.1) | 1.5 (0.1) |
18 | 1.6 | 1.7 (0.1) | 1.7 (0.1) | |
Kim et al. (2003) | 19 | 1.0 | 0.9 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.1) |
20 | 1.3 | 1.2 (0.1) | 1.2 (0.1) | |
21 | 1.3 | 1.3 (0.0) | 1.2 (0.1) | |
22 | 1.4 | 1.4 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.1) | |
23 | 1.7 | 1.7 (0.0) | 1.7 (0.0) | |
24 | 1.8 | 1.9 (0.1) | 1.8 (0.0) | |
25 | 1.8 | 1.7 (0.1) | 1.9 (0.1) | |
26 | 2.2 | 2.2 (0.0) | 2.2 (0.0) | |
27 | 2.3 | 2.3 (0.0) | 2.4 (0.1) | |
28 | 2.4 | 2.4 (0.0) | 2.4 (0.0) | |