Skip to main content

Table 2 Test and calculated results.

From: Flexural Strength of RC Beam Strengthened by Partially De-bonded Near Surface-Mounted FRP Strip

Specimens

P cr (kN)

Yield

Ultimate

μ (δ u /δ y )

ΔP (kN)

P n (kN)

\( \frac{{P_{u} }}{{P_{n} }} \)

Failure patterns

P y (kN)

δ y (mm)

P u (kN)

δ u (mm)

BC2000

42.65

143.18

6.03

190.24

79.61

13.20

–

109.65

1.73

Ductile failure

BP1600

56.93

167.20

5.97

190.25

10.12

1.70

45.6

186.97

1.02

FRP peel off

CP1600-1

66.20

200.55

6.72

225.55

15.98

2.38

72.08

206.32

1.09

FRP fracture

CP1600-3

46.58

173.58

6.63

233.40

26.13

3.94

72.08

206.32

1.13

CP500-1

42.17

161.32

6.35

208.39

19.06

3.00

54.92

193.10

1.08

CP500-3

53.45

162.79

6.04

233.40

26.13

4.33

72.08

206.32

1.13

CP400-1a

52.50

163.50

–

225.00

–

–

–

185.81

1.21

CP400-3

41.19

151.02

6.60

224.08

29.67

4.50

59.82

206.32

1.09

CP300-1

40.21

154.95

6.63

194.17

19.16

2.89

40.7

177.23

1.10

CP300-3

53.94

145.14

6.70

212.31

24.46

3.65

52.95

203.93

1.04

  1. P cr is cracking load, P y and δ y are load and displacement at yield state, P u and δ u are load and displacement at ultimate state, ΔP is load increase by FRP retrofit and P n is calculated load through the calculation process of flexural strength by Eq. (1).
  2. aDisplacement data of this specimen were not recorded.