Skip to main content

Table 4 Evaluation results on the validation concrete decks by various survey methods.

From: Seasonal Variation and Age-related Changes in the Relative Permittivity of Concrete Bridge Decks on Korea Expressways

Location

Visual inspection

GPR

Survey area (m2)

Damage

Survey area (m2)

Relative permittivity

Depth-corrected attenuation (normalized, − 3 dB)

Damage (over 12) (current rule)

Damage (out of 6 ~ 11) (suggested criteria)

Area (m2)

Ratio (%)

Rating

Area (m2)

Ratio (%)

Rating

Area (m2)

Ratio (%)

Rating

Area (m2)

Ratio (%)

Rating

JB-3N

Span 2

336

2.4

0.7

b

271.8

3.6

1.3

b

21.8

8.0

c

19.9

7.3

c

Span 3

336

65.9

19.6

d

271.8

16.8

6.2

c

52.5

19.3

d

60.6

22.3

e

Span 4

336

16.8

5.0

c

271.8

49.4

18.2

d

125.0

46.0

e

60.4

22.2

e

Span 5

336

8.9

2.6

c

271.8

48.8

18.0

d

63.8

19.0

d

48.3

17.8

d

Total

1344

93.9

7.0

c

1087.2

118.7

10.9

d

263.1

19.5

d

189.2

17.4

d

JB-3S

Span 2

336

3.0

0.9

b

274.5

1.3

0.5

b

3.4

1.2

b

23.2

8.4

c

Span 3

336

0.3

0.1

b

274.5

3.6

1.3

b

19.2

7.0

c

11.2

4.1

c

Span 4

336

5.7

1.7

b

274.5

4.7

1.7

b

9.1

3.3

c

21.2

7.7

c

Span 5

336

8.7

2.6

c

274.5

1.6

0.6

b

6.1

2.2

c

23.7

8.6

c

Total

1344

17.7

1.3

b

1098

11.2

1.0

b

37.7

3.4

c

79.3

7.2

c