Skip to main content

Table 11 The comparison between predicted to test and FE results

From: Numerical FE Modeling and Design Methods of CCES Columns with Normal-Weight Crushed Dolomite Coarse Aggregate Fully Embedded IPE Steel-Section

Specimen number

Test to calculated ultimate capacity, kN

Put,Test/Puo,YB

Put,Test/Puo, CECS

Pu,FE,/Puo, Hong Kong

Put,Test /Puo,ECP203

Put,Test/Puo,ECP-LRFD

Put,Test/Puo,ACI

Put,Tes/ Puo,AISC

Put,Test/Puo,BS

Put,Test/Puo,EC4

Specimen #1

1.21

1.39

1.56

1.33

1.61

1.41

1.40

1.59

1.23

Specimen #2

1.21

1.40

1.57

1.33

1.62

1.41

1.40

1.60

1.23

Specimen #3

1.31

1.51

1.69

1.44

1.74

1.52

1.51

1.72

1.32

Specimen #4

1.31

1.51

1.69

1.44

1.74

1.52

1.51

1.72

1.32

Mean

1.26

1.45

1.63

1.38

1.68

1.46

1.46

1.66

1.28

Standard deviation

0.048

0.055

0.062

0.053

0.064

0.056

0.056

0.063

0.049

Coef. of var. = stand. dev./mean

0.038

0.038

0.038

0.038

0.038

0.038

0.038

0.038

0.038

Specimen number

FE to calculated ultimate capacity, kN

 

Pu,FE/Puo,YB

Pu,FE/Puo,CECS

Pu,FE/Puo,Hong Kong

Pu,FE/Puo,ECP20

Pu,FE/Puo,ECP-LRFD

Pu,FE/Puo,ACI

Pu,FE/ Puo,AISC

Pu,FE/Puo,BS

Pu,FE/Puo,EC4

Specimen #1

1.22

1.41

1.58

1.34

1.63

1.42

1.414

1.614

1.240

Specimen #2

1.22

1.40

1.58

1.34

1.62

1.42

1.409

1.608

1.236

Specimen #3

1.25

1.44

1.62

1.37

1.67

1.45

1.446

1.650

1.268

Specimen #4

1.25

1.44

1.62

1.37

1.66

1.45

1.444

1.648

1.266

Mean

1.23

1.42

1.60

1.36

1.65

1.44

1.428

1.630

1.253

Standard deviation

0.014

0.017

0.019

0.016

0.019

0.017

0.017

0.019

0.015

Coef. of var. = stand. dev./mean

0.012

0.012

0.012

0.012

0.012

0.012

0.012

0.012

0.012