Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of theoretical value and experimental result

From: Resistance Behaviours of Clamped HFR-LWC Beam Using Membrane Approach

Beam ID

Reinf. ratio (%)

Rod-config

\(q_{e}\)(kN)

\(q_{t}\)(kN)

\(q_{y}\)(kN)

\(q_{e} /q_{y}\)

\(q_{t} /q_{y}\)

\(f\)(mm)

\({f \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {f h}} \right. \kern-0pt} h}\)

A23

0.28

184.0

170.7

34.63

5.31

4.93

14.5

0.073

A24

0.28

128.0

126.4

34.63

3.67

3.65

7.4

0.037

A22

0.28

none

31.7

34.63

34.63

0.92

1.00

18.3

0.092

A53

0.28

168.0

165.6

34.65

4.85

4.78

7.8

0.039

A66

0.28

103.0

99.1

34.65

2.97

2.86

7.6

0.038

A64

0.28

64.0

61.7

34.65

1.85

1.78

10.7

0.054

A67

0.28

124.0

121.6

34.65

3.58

3.51

17.3

0.087

A63

0.28

none

36.2

34.65

34.65

1.04

1.00

28.8

0.144

A61

0.42

194.0

187.4

51.92

3.74

3.61

9.2

0.046

A62

0.42

None

51.0

51.92

51.92

1.00

1.00

22.0

0.117

  1. \(q_{e}\) is the experimental ultimate load; \(q_{t}\) is the theoretical ultimate load; \(q_{y}\) is the yield line value; \(f\) is the peak experimental deflection and \(h\) is the section height.