ACI 446. (2009). Fracture toughness testing of concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: America Concrete Institute (in progress).
ASTM. (2005). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual book of ASTM standards, C496/C496M (Vol. 04.02).
Bažant, Z. P. (1976). Instability, ductility, and size effect in strain softening concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, 102(2), 331–344.
Bažant, Z. P., & Planas, J. (1998). Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Google Scholar
Bažant, Z. P., & Yu, Q. (2011). Size effect testing of cohesive fracture parameters and nonuniqueness of work-of-fracture method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,137(8), 580–588.
Article
Google Scholar
CEB-FIP. (1990). Final draft CEB-FIP model code 1990. Bulletin Information Committee Euro-International, Beton 203.
CEB-FIP. (2010). Final draft CEB-FIP model code 2010. Bulletin Information Committee Euro-International. Beton 203.
Coronado, C., & Lopez, M. (2005). Modeling of FRP-concrete bond using nonlinear damage mechanics. Proceedings of the FRPRCS-7: 7th International symposium on fiber reinforced polymer reinforcement for reinforced concrete structures, ACI, KS.
Coronado, C. A., & Lopez, M. M. (2008). Experimental characterization of concrete epoxy interfaces. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,20(4), 303–312.
Article
Google Scholar
Elices, M., Guinea, G., & Planas, J. (1992). Measurement of the fracture energy using 3-point bend tests. 1. Influence of experimental procedures. Materials and Structures,25(148), 212–218.
Google Scholar
Elices, M., Guinea, G. V., Gomez, J., & Planas, J. (2002). The cohesive zone model: Advantages, limitations and challenges. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,69(2), 137–163.
Article
Google Scholar
Gerstle, W. (2010). Progress in developing a standard fracture toughness test for concrete. Structures Congress 2010, ASCE, Orlando, FL.
Guinea, G., Planas, J., & Elices, M. (1994). A general bilinear fitting for the softening curve of concrete. Materials and Structures,27(2), 99–105.
Article
Google Scholar
Hillerborg, A., Modeer, M., & Petersson, P. (1976). Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Research,6(6), 773–782.
Article
Google Scholar
Kitsutaka, Y., Kurihara, N., & Nakamura, S. (1998). Evaluation method of tension softening properties. Proceedings of the FRAMCOS 3 preconference workshop on quantitative evaluation methods for toughness and softening properties of concrete, Gifu, Japan.
Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S., & Onate, E. (1989). Plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures,25(3), 299–326.
Article
Google Scholar
Maturana, P., Planas, J., & Elices, M. (1990). Evolution of fracture behaviour of saturated concrete in the low temperature range. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,35(4–5), 827–834.
Article
Google Scholar
Petersson, P. E. (1981). Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials. Rep. TVBM-1006, Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden.
Planas, J., Guinea, G. V., & Elices, M. (1999). Size effect and inverse analysis in concrete fracture. International Journal of Fracture,95(1–4), 367–378.
Article
Google Scholar
Planas, J., Guinea, G. V., Galvez, J. C., Sanz, B., & Fathy, A. M. (2007). Indirect test for stress–crack opening curve. RILEM report-TC-187-SOC.
Reinhardt, H. W., Cornelissen, H. A. W., & Hordijk, D. A. (1986). Tensile tests and failure analysis of concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering,112(11), 2462–2477.
Article
Google Scholar
RILEM Draft Recommendation. (1990). Determination of fracture parameter (K
sic
and CTODc) of plain concrete using three point bend tests. Materials and Structures,23, 457–460.
Article
Google Scholar
Rocco, C., Guinea, G. V., Planas, J., & Elices, M. (2001). Review of the splitting-test standards from a fracture mechanics point of view. Cement and Concrete Research,31(1), 73–82.
Article
Google Scholar