Skip to content

Advertisement

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials Cover Image
  • Article
  • Open Access

A Study on High Performance Fine-Grained Concrete Containing Rice Husk Ash

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials20148:78

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-014-0078-z

©  The Author(s) 2014

  • Received: 17 April 2013
  • Accepted: 4 March 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

Rice husk ash (RHA) is classified as a highly reactive pozzolan. It has a very high silica content similar to that of silica fume (SF). Using less-expensive and locally available RHA as a mineral admixture in concrete brings ample benefits to the costs, the technical properties of concrete as well as to the environment. An experimental study of the effect of RHA blending on workability, strength and durability of high performance fine-grained concrete (HPFGC) is presented. The results show that the addition of RHA to HPFGC improved significantly compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and chloride penetration resistance. Interestingly, the ratio of compressive strength to splitting tensile strength of HPFGC was lower than that of ordinary concrete, especially for the concrete made with 20 % RHA. Compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of HPFGC containing RHA was similar and slightly higher, respectively, than for HPFGC containing SF. Chloride penetration resistance of HPFGC containing 10–15 % RHA was comparable with that of HPFGC containing 10 % SF.

Keywords

  • high performance fine-grained concrete
  • rice husk ash
  • workability
  • compressive strength
  • splitting tensile strength
  • chloride penetration resistance

1 Introduction

The use of locally available materials as well as the use of industrial and agricultural waste in building industry has become a potential solution to the economic and environmental problems of particularly developing countries. Coarse aggregate is considered as the main ingredient to produce Portland cement concrete. However, the resources of this material are depleting in many countries or in specific regions, therefore finding a potential substitute for coarse aggregate is crucial. The use of sand (natural or crushed) as a substitute for coarse aggregate to produce sand concrete was investigated. This kind of concrete has strength comparable with conventional Portland cement concrete. By definition, sand concrete is therefore defined as a fine aggregate concrete, in which coarse aggregate is replaced by sand and fine aggregate is by filler material (Bederina et al. 2012; Bederina et al. 2007; Khay et al. 2010). High performance fine-grained concrete (HPFGC) is considered as a new generation of sand concrete, and can be comparable with high performance concrete in strength and durability.

RHA is the residue of completely incinerated rice husk under proper conditions. Rice husk, the outer covering part of rice kernel, is an agricultural waste from the milling process of paddy. Rice husk is abundant in many parts of the world, especially in rice cultivating countries, like Vietnam. Each ton of paddy rice can produce approximately 200 kg of rice husk, which on combustion produces about 40 kg of ash (Bui 2001). According to the’’Rice market monitor’’ report [FAO (2012)], the global rice paddy production in 2011 was about 723 million tons (in which the Vietnam paddy production was about 42 million tons) that results in approximately 145 million tons of rice husks. Rice husk from paddy rice mills is disposed directly into the environment or sometimes is dumped or burnt in open piles on the fields. This results in serious environmental pollution, especially after it is disintegrated under wet conditions.

RHA is classified as a highly reactive pozzolan. It possesses a very high silica content similar to that of SF (Mehta 1994). Using less-expensive and locally available RHA as a mineral admixture in concrete brings benefits to the economy, the technical properties of concrete and the environment as well. RHA is a porous material. Pore structure is the most important characteristic of this material. The change of this characteristic results in a different specific surface area (SSA) and therefore a different pozzolanic reactivity and different water absorption of RHA (Bui 2001; Nguyen 2011; Le et al. 2012; Van et al. 2013). RHA has been studied to replace SF as a partial Portland cement replacement, and the results show that RHA can fully substitute SF in terms of calcium hydroxide consumption, autogeneous shrinkage, compressive strength and durability of high performance concrete (Bui 2001; Van et al. 2013; Feng et al. 2004; Le et al. 2012; Salas et al. 2009) and ultra high performance concrete (Nguyen 2011; Nguyen et al. 2011). However, the effect of RHA on properties of HPFGC needs additional research.

The objective of this study is to investigate effects imposed by RHA blending on properties of HPFGC. Blending percentages were varied. Slump, compressive and splitting tensile strength, abrasion resistance and chloride penetration resistance of concrete containing RHA were evaluated. These properties were assessed for the reference and SF containing samples as well. The knowledge obtained in this study can be instrumental for optimizing strength and durability of mortar and concrete in future applications.

2 Experimental Program

2.1 Materials

Portland cement (PC40 conforming to Vietnamese standard TCVN 2682:1999 and is similar to CEM I 42.5 R conforming to DIN EN 197-1), RHA, SF, limestone powder (LSP) and two kinds of natural sand, i.e. fine sand and coarse sand were used in this study. RHA was produced by burning rice husk under proper temperature conditions in a simple incinerator prototype in Vietnam. It was designed based on the principle of the atmospheric bubbling fluidized bed (Armesto et al. 2002). The obtained ash was ground in a ball mill. The physical properties and the chemical composition of the cement, RHA, SF and LSP are summarized in Table 1. The physical properties of fine and coarse sand are presented in Table 2. In addition, a polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer (Viscocrete-V3000) was used.
Table 1

Chemical composition and physical properties of cement and mineral admixtures.

Chemical analyses (%)

PC40

RHA

SF

LSP

SiO2

21.29

86.81

96.20

0.17

Al2O3

5.72

0.50

0.70

0.02

Fe2O3

3.30

0.87

0.30

0.04

CaO

63.18

1.04

0.00

54.88

MgO

1.10

0.85

0.10

0.45

Na2O

0.12

0.69

0.06

0.02

K2O

0.30

3.16

0.37

0.04

LOI

0.193

4.6

1.60

43.46

Density (g/cm3)

3.10

2.24

2.26

2.72

Mean particle size (µm)

16.12

8.42

0.29

18.19

Blaine SSA[BET-SSA] (m2/g)

0.369

[23.32]

[26.43]

0.321

LOI loss on ignition.

Table 2

Sieve analysis and physical properties of the fine and coarse sand.

 

Passing percentage (%)

Fine sand

Coarse sand

Sieve size (mm)

  

 4.75

100

100

 2.36

100

94.9

 1.18

99.7

72.2

 0.6

89.1

38.2

 0.3

42.9

14.1

 0.15

1.1

0.6

Fineness modulus

1.9

2.8

Density (g/cm3)

2.6

2.6

Absorption (%)

2.0

1.9

2.2 Mixture Proportions

HPFGC mixtures were designed based on the absolute volume of the constituent materials (Béton de sable 1994; Béton 1995) in which the paste volume was computed from the void content in the sand mixture with mass ratio of coarse to fine sand of 2.33. This ratio corresponded to the mixture with highest granular packing density assessed experimentally. Water binder (w/b) ratio was determined according to ACI 211.1 and ACI 363.2R. The designed compressive strength of HPFGC was fixed at 60 MPa. In this study, six mixtures were designed with a constant w/b ratio of 0.33, resulting from the binder (cement, RHA) content of 530 kg/m3 and a filler content (RHA+LSP) of 150 kg/m3. Herein, RHA acts as a part of the binder and of the filler. RHA was incorporated with replacement levels of 5, 10, 15, and 20 % by weight. One control mixture and one mixture incorporating 10 % SF were prepared for comparison purpose. The mixture proportions of HPFGC are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Mixture proportions of HPFGC investigated.

Mixture

Cement (kg/m3)

RHA (kg/m3)

SF (kg/m3)

LSP (kg/m3)

Water (kg/m3)

Coarse sand (kg/m3)

Fine sand (kg/m3)

SP (%)

REF

530

0

0

150

175

1,045

448

0.12

5 % RHA

505

25

0

125

175

1,055

452

0.12

10 % RHA

482

48

0

102

175

1,064

456

0.11

15 % RHA

461

69

0

81

175

1,073

460

0.11

20 % RHA

442

88

0

62

175

1,081

463

0.11

10 % SF

482

0

48

102

175

1,064

456

0.11

SP superplasticizer.

2.3 Preparation of Test Specimens

All mixtures were prepared in a compulsory mixer with total mixing time of 8 min. Coarse and fine sand and powder materials (cement, LSP, RHA) were mixed in dry conditions for a period of 2 min. Next, about 80 % of the water was added, whereupon the concrete mixture was mixed for 2 min. Finally, about 20 % of the water and superplasticizer were added and the concrete mixture was mixed for 4 min. Slump test were conducted to evaluate workability of mixtures according to ASTM C143. Cylinders of 150 × 300 mm2 were cast for determination of compressive and splitting tensile strength. Cylinders of 100 × 200 mm2 were cast for determination of chloride penetration resistance. Cube specimens of 70.7 × 70.7 × 70.7 mm3 were cast for determination of abrasion resistance. All specimens were compacted in two layers on a vibrating table. Each layer was vibrated for 20 s. The moulds were covered with polyethylene sheets and moistened for 24 h. After 1 day, the specimens were demoulded, and stored in water at 20 ± 2 °C until testing at 3, 7, and 28 days. Compressive and splitting tensile strength of concrete were determined in agreement with ASTM C39 and ASTM C496, respectively. Chloride penetration resistance was determined at 28 days in agreement with ASTM C1202. The tests were carried out in triplicate and the average values were reported. Abrasion resistance of HPFGC was determined at 28 days following Böhme method (CEN 2003). A dried specimen is held in contact with a cast iron disc with a pressure of 0.6 daN/cm2. The disc rotates at 30 ± 1 rpm. For each specimen, the disc runs 140 revolutions. During the process, the specimen is progressively rotated through 90o, and sand with maximum particle size of 2 mm is spread on the disc. The abrasion index (g/mm2) is calculated by dividing the mass loss of each specimen by its abraded area.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Workability

Slump data of the fresh concrete are presented in Fig. 1. It can be seen that the control mixture had highest slump compared to mixtures containing RHA and SF. Increasing RHA content resulted in a lower slump of fresh concrete. As reported in (Le et al. 2012; Van et al. 2013), RHA is a porous material with macro and meso-pores inside and on surface of the particles resulting in a very large SSA. SF also has a very large SSA, significantly larger than that of cement, due to its very fine particles (Table 1). RHA will absorb a certain amount of mixing water. Using RHA or SF as replacements for cement leads to an increase in SSA of the binder (cement + RHA/SF) thus to a decrease in free water compared to the mixture made without RHA or SF. Consequently, mixtures incorporating RHA or SF had lower slump. This effect was more pronounced, when a higher content of RHA was used.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Slump of fresh HPFGC.

3.2 Compressive Strength and Splitting Tensile Strength

3.2.1 Compressive Strength

In Fig. 2, compressive strength of HPFGC containing RHA/SF and control HPFGC at 3, 7 and 28 days is shown. Incorporating RHA increased compressive strength of HPFGC compared to control concrete regardless of ages, except for mixture containing 20 % RHA at 3 days. A highest value of 62.3 MPa was obtained for compressive strength at 10 % RHA blending, and the lowest value of 54.0 MPa for the control sample. As seen in Fig. 2, the optimum content of RHA tended to be higher at later age, i.e. 10 % RHA at 3 days, 15 % RHA at 7 days and 10–20 % RHA at 28 days, and may be 15–20 % RHA at later ages, e.g. 56 and 90 days as found in (Le et al. 2012).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Compressive strength of HPFGC.

The positive effect of RHA on compressive strength will be due to the high pozzolanity of RHA resulting from the large SSA and the high silica content. RHA reacts intensively with the water and the calcium hydroxide generated from the hydration of cement to produce additional C–S–H (Bui 2001; Nguyen et al. 2011; Safiuddin et al. 2011). The additional C–S–H itself is the main strength-contributing compound, and also fills in the capillary pores to improve the microstructure of the paste matrix and transition zone in concrete resulting in enhancement of compressive strength. Another reason is that the finer RHA particles can fill the empty spaces between the cement particles leading to higher density of the paste matrix (Safiuddin et al. 2011). Moreover, the increase in compressive strength of concrete made with RHA at more matured conditions is also due to the internal curing of RHA in the cement paste. RHA with porous structure may absorb free water during mixing leading to lower w/b ratios of RHA mixtures. This amount of water is released from the pores, when the relative humidity in paste diminishes at further maturation because of cement hydration, and causes a prolonged hydration (Nguyen et al. 2011). The internal curing by RHA could be an important reason for the improvement of compressive strength at later age of HPFGC containing high RHA content, e.g. the HPFGC made with 15 and 20 % RHA at 28 days and later ages. However, the addition of very high content of RHA is supposed to induce adverse effects on compressive strength, especially at early ages, e.g. 3-day compressive strength of HPFGC containing 20 % RHA. This is consistent with with the 7-days compressive strength results of UHPC (Nguyen et al. 2011). At high blending percentages of RHA, the concrete will contain a significantly reduced cement content. This diluting effect may account for the lower strength at 3 days (Kjellsen et al. 1999; Siddique and Khan 2011). Besides, RHA absorbs a certain amount of water during mixing resulting in the lack of available water in the system for cement hydration. Moreover, RHA particles are themselves weakest points in the hardened matrix due to their pore structure, as mentioned in (Le et al. 2012).

As seen in Fig. 2, the compressive strength of 10 and 15 % RHA HPFGC was similar to that of the 10 % SF sample at 3, 7, and 28 days. Indeed, RHA is not only comparable with SF with respects to the enhancement of the packing density of granular mixtures, but also on the pozzolanic reaction (Le et al. 2012; Nguyen et al. 2011). RHA is however assumed to improve compressive strength due to the internal water curing and the lower effective w/b ratio of concrete, as mentioned previously.

3.2.2 Splitting Tensile Strength

It is found that the trend in splitting tensile strength was almost similar with that of compressive strength (Fig. 3). Generally up to a replacement level of 15 %, splitting tensile strength of RHA containing HPFGC was higher than that of the control sample. The highest value of 6.49 MPa was obtained for splitting tensile strength at 10 % RHA replacement, and the lowest value of 5.12 MPa was obtained for the control sample. HPFGC proportioned with 20 % RHA had lower splitting tensile strength with respect to the control sample. It is well documented that splitting tensile strength is mainly governed by aggregate-paste bond (Nazari and Riahi 2011; Parra et al. 2011). RHA incorporation refined the transition zone between cement matrix and aggregate, and reduced the amount of large calcium hydroxide crystals and ettringite due to additional C–S–H phases generated from pozzolanic reaction, as mentioned in the previous section.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Splitting tensile strength of HPFGC.

Generally speaking, shrinkage will be stimulated at higher cement contents (De Schutter et al. 2008). This may lead to crack formation along the aggregate-paste interface and, as a consequence, to a lower tensile splitting strength (Nguyen et al. 2011). As discussed previously, RHA particles absorb a certain amount of mixing water into their pores. It has been proposed that at later age, the absorbed water released from inside of the pores to the surrounding cement matrix will cause the relative humidity in the interior not to drop, resulting in significantly less autogeneous shrinkage due to self-desiccation (Nguyen 2011).

The decrease in splitting tensile strength of 20 % RHA HPFGC compared to the control sample may be due to abundance of RHA particles that can be emphasized as porous micro-aggregate. Those weaken the matrix and hence reduce the split strength of concrete.

Figure 3 also shows that splitting tensile strength of samples containing 10 and 15 % RHA was comparable with that of sample containing 10 % SF, irrespective of ages. The higher splitting tensile strength of the SF sample compared to the control sample can also be explained by refinement of the transition zone due to the pozzolanic and filler effect. This is consistent with another study (Bhanja and Sengupta 2005).

3.2.3 Ratio of Compressive Strength to Splitting Tensile Strength

In Table 4, the ratio of compressive to splitting tensile strength is presented. The ratio of RHA HPFGC was higher than that of the SF sample regardless of the RHA content. Only the ratio of HPFGC containing 20 % RHA was higher than that of control sample. The highest ratio amounted 11.10 at a RHA content of 20 %.
Table 4

Compressive and splitting tensile strength at 28 days.

Mixtures

Compressive strength (MPa)

Splitting tensile strength (MPa)

Compressive/Splitting tensile strength

REF

54.0

5.1

10.6

5 % RHA

55.4

5.6

10.0

10 % RHA

62.3

6.5

9.6

15 % RHA

60.3

6.0

10.1

20 % RHA

60.2

5.4

11.1

10 % SF

59.0

6.3

9.4

In this study, the ratio of compressive to splitting tensile strength of HPFGC was in the range of 9.6–11.0. Whereas the ratio of ordinary concrete is in the range of 10.5–15.2 (Shetty 2003). This indicates HPFGC to have higher splitting tensile strength than ordinary concrete at equal compressive strength. In this study, sand was used as the main aggregate, possibly resulting in the reduction in wall effect in the cement paste in the vicinity of the aggregate surfaces and the reduction in thickness of the interface transition zone (Nguyen 2011; Ollivier et al. 1995). Consequently, the splitting tensile strength of the HPFGC was improved.

3.3 Mechanical Abrasion Resistance

Abrasion index of HSPC determined at 28 days is shown in Fig. 4. The higher abrasion index, the lower mechanical abrasion resistance is. The result shows that mechanical abrasion resistance of HPFGC was very high. RHA containing HPFGC had a lower abrasion index, indicating better abrasion resistance than that of the control sample. The lowest value for the abrasion index of 0.0006 g/mm2 was found for the 10 % RHA blend. It is generally known that compressive strength is one of the most important factors influencing the abrasion resistance of concrete (Horszczaruk 2005). This is supported by the outcomes of this study (see Figs. 2 and 4). The abrasion index of 10 % SF concrete was similar to those of 10 and of 15 % RHA samples. It is closely related to the results of compressive strength above.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Abrasion of HPFGC at 28 days.

3.4 Chloride Penetration Resistance

Charge passed of HPFGC at 28 days is displayed in Fig. 5. It can be seen that RHA or SF incorporation substantially decreased the charge passed of concrete, indicating an increase in resistance to chloride penetration. Increasing RHA replacement percentage decreases charge passed. The lowest value of charge passed was obtained for 20 % RHA sample as 261 coulombs, and the highest value was found for the control sample as 2,782 coulombs. For concrete mixed with 10 % SF, the value of charge passed was also significantly lower than that of the control concrete, and similar to those of the concretes mixed with 15 and 20 % RHA.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Chloride penetration of HPFGC.

The chloride penetration resistance of mortar and concrete is one of the most essential aspects concerning the durability of concrete structures. The reinforcement steel bar in concrete starts to corrode due to depassivation, when the chloride concentration of mortar or concrete exceeds a certain threshold (Alonso et al. 2000; Thomas 1996). The incorporation of a pozzolan is generally accepted to improve the resistance to chloride penetration and reduce the chloride-induced corrosion initiation period of steel reinforcement. The improvement is mainly due to the reduction of permeability/diffusivity, particularly to chloride ion transportation of the concrete containing mineral admixtures (Bijen 1996; Thomas and Bamforth 1999). As mentioned previously, RHA incorporation refines the cement matrix and reduces the amount of large calcium hydroxide due to additional C–S–H phases generated from the pozzolanic reaction. Furthermore, RHA with pore structure might be considered as internal curing agent to significantly prolong hydration of the blended cement. Therefore, the permeability of concrete is reduced. The pore-refining capacity of RHA in concrete has been assumed to improve resistance to chloride penetration (Salas et al. 2009; Chindaprasirt et al. 2008; Ganesan et al. 2008; Rodríguez de Sensale 2010).

4 Conclusions

This study analyses aspects of compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, abrasion resistance and durability in terms of chloride penetration resistance of HPFGC containing RHA with various replacement levels. For comparison, control and SF containing samples were evaluated for these properties. Based on the experimental results in the present study, the following conclusions can be drawn.
  1. (1)

    Workability of HPFGC containing RHA decreases at the higher replacement levels compared to that of the control mixture due to the pore structure of RHA.

     
  2. (2)

    Incorporating RHA increased compressive strength of HPFGC compared to that of the control concrete regardless of ages, except for concrete containing 20 % RHA at 3 days. Compressive strength of 10 and 15 % RHA blended HPFGC is similar to that of 10 % SF sample at 3, 7, and 28 days.

     
  3. (3)

    In replacement range of 5–20 % RHA, there exists an optimum RHA content resulting in the highest compressive strength of concrete at each age. The optimum content is higher at later age, i.e. 10 % RHA at 3 days, 15 % RHA at 7 days and 10–20 % RHA at 28 days.

     
  4. (4)

    Up to 15 % RHA replacement, splitting tensile strength of RHA containing HPFGC is higher than that of the control sample. Splitting tensile strength of samples containing 10 and 15 % RHA is comparable with that of the sample containing 10 % SF, irrespective of ages.

     
  5. (5)

    Addition of RHA provides a dramatic improvement in chloride penetration resistance of HPFGC. The increase in RHA replacement level increases the chloride penetration resistance. The resistance to chloride penetration of concretes mixed with 15 and 20 % RHA is similar to that of concrete mixed with 10 % SF.

     

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express thanks to Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam, F.A. Finger-Institute for Building Materials Science, German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and Department of Construction Materials, University of Transport and Communications in Vietnam for funding and support. The authors are also grateful to Dipl.-Ing. Müller, M. for helpful discussions.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
F.A. Finger-Institute for Building Materials Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany
(2)
Institute of Construction Engineering, University of Transport and Communications, Hanoi, Vietnam

References

  1. AFNOR. Béton (1995): béton de sable, Paris, France, NF P18-500.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, C., Andrade, C., Castellote, M., & Castro, P. (2000). Chloride threshold values to depassivate reinforcing bars embedded in a standardized opc mortar. Cement and Concrete Research,30(7), 1047–1055.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Armesto, L., Bahillo, A., Veijonen, K., Cabanillas, A., & Otero, J. (2002). Combustion behaviour of rice husk in a bubbling fluidised bed. Biomass and Bioenergy,23(3), 171–179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bederina, M., Gotteicha, M., Belhadj, B., Dheily, R. M., Khenfer, M. M., & Queneudec, M. (2012). Drying shrinkage studies of wood sand concrete-effect of different wood treatments. Construction and Building Materials,36, 1066–1075.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bederina, M., Marmoret, L., Mezreb, K., Khenfer, M. M., Bali, A., & Que´neudec, M. (2007). Effect of the addition of wood shavings on thermal conductivity of sand concretes: Experimental study and modelling. Construction and Building Materials,21(3), 662–668.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Béton de sable, caractéristique et pratiques d’utilisation, Synthése du Projet National de Recherche et Développement SABLOCRETE. (1994). Presses de l’Ecole National des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  7. Bhanja, S., & Sengupta, B. (2005). Influence of silica fume on the tensile strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research,35(4), 743–747.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bijen, J. (1996). Benefits of slag and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials,10(5), 309–314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bui, D. D. (2001). Rice husk ash as a mineral admixture for high performance concrete. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherland.Google Scholar
  10. CEN. (2003). Concrete paving blocks - requirements and test methods: Measurement of abrasion according to the böhme test, Brüssel, Belgium, DIN EN 1338.Google Scholar
  11. Chindaprasirt, P., Rukzon, S., & Sirivivatnanon, V. (2008). Resistance to chloride penetration of blended portland cement mortar containing palm oil fuel ash, rice husk ash and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials,22(5), 932–938.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. De Schutter, G., Bartos, P., Domone, P., & Gibbs, J. (2008). Self-compacting concrete. Caithness, UK: Whittles Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. FAO. (2012). Rice market monitor, http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ap88e.pdf
  14. Feng, Q., Yamamichi, H., Shoya, M., & Sugita, S. (2004). Study on the pozzolanic properties of rice husk ash by hydrochloric acid pretreatment. Cement and Concrete Research,34(3), 521–526.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganesan, K., Rajagopal, K., & Thangavel, K. (2008). Rice husk ash blended cement: Assessment of optimal level of replacement for strength and permeability properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials,22(8), 1675–1683.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Horszczaruk, E. (2005). Abrasion resistance of high-strength concrete in hydraulic structures. Wear,259(1–6), 62–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Khay, S. E. E., Neji, J., & Loulizi, A. (2010). Shrinkage properties of compacted sand concrete used in pavements. Construction and Building Materials,24(9), 1790–1795.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kjellsen, K.-O., Wallevik, O.-H., & Hallgren, M. (1999). On the compressive strength development of high-performance concrete and paste-effect of silica fume. Materials and Structures,32(1), 63–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Le, H. T., Rößler, C., Siewert, K., Ludwig, H.-M. (2012). Rice husk ash as a pozzolanic viscosity modifying admixture for self-compacting high performance mortar. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on building materials, Weimar, Germany. F.A. Finger-Institut für Baustoffkunde, 0538–0545Google Scholar
  20. Le, H. T., Siewert, K., Ludwig, H.-M. (2012). Synergistic effects of rice husk ash and fly ash on properties of self-compacting high performance concrete. In Proceedings of symposium on Ultra high performance concrete and Nanotechnology for High performance construction materials, Kassel, Germany, 187–195Google Scholar
  21. Mehta, P. K. (1994). Rice husk ash: A unique supplementary cementing material. In Proceedings of Advances in concrete technology, Center for mineral and Energy Technology, Ottawa, Canada, 419–444Google Scholar
  22. Nazari, A., & Riahi, S. (2011). Splitting tensile strength of concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and sio2 nanoparticles as binder. Energy and Buildings,43(4), 864–872.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen, V. T. (2011). Rice husk ash as a mineral admixture for ultra high performance concrete. PhD thesis, Delft, Netherland.Google Scholar
  24. Nguyen, V. T., Ye, G., Breugel, K. V., Fraaij, A. L. A., & Bui, D. D. (2011). The study of using rice husk ash to produce ultra high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials,25(4), 2030–2035.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ollivier, J. P., Maso, J. C., & Bourdette, B. (1995). Interfacial transition zone in concrete. Advanced Cement Based Materials,2(1), 30–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Parra, C., Valcuende, M., & Gómez, F. (2011). Splitting tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials,25(1), 201–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodríguez de Sensale, G. (2010). Effect of rice-husk ash on durability of cementitious materials. Cement & Concrete Composites,32(9), 718–725.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Safiuddin, M., West, J. S., & Soudki, K. A. (2011). Flowing ability of the mortars formulated from self-compacting concretes incorporating rice husk ash. Construction and Building Materials,25(2), 973–978.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Salas, A., Delvasto, S., De Gutierrez, R. M., & Lange, D. (2009). Comparison of two processes for treating rice husk ash for use in high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research,39(9), 773–778.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shetty, M. S. (2003). Concrete technology (theory and practice). New Delhi, India: S Chand & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  31. Siddique, R., & Khan, I. M. (2011). Supplementary cementing materials. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Thomas, M. (1996). Chloride thresholds in marine concrete. Cement and Concrete Research,26(4), 513–519.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas, M. D. A., & Bamforth, P. B. (1999). Modelling chloride diffusion in concrete: Effect of fly ash and slag. Cement and Concrete Research,29(4), 487–495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Van, V. -T. -A., Rößler, C., Bui, D. -D., & Ludwig, H. -M. (2013). Mesoporous structure and pozzolanic reactivity of rice husk ash in cementitious system. Construction and Building Materials,43, 208–216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2014

Advertisement