 Open access
 Published:
Time and Crack Effect on Chloride Diffusion for Concrete with Fly Ash
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials volume 12, Article number: 14 (2018)
Abstract
Nuclear power plants are constructed very close to the marine environments for cooling water and the structures are more susceptible to chloride induced corrosion. Cracking in RC structures in mass concrete is unavoidable when they are exposed to chloride contaminated chemical environments. This study is focused on the evaluation of crack and time effect on chloride diffusion rate. Two types of concrete strength grade were taken for nuclear power plant construction and the crack was induced with varying from 0.05 to 1.35 mm of width. The tests for chloride diffusion coefficients from steadystate condition were performed. The influence of crack width on the chloride transmission behavior was discussed and analyzed over an exposure period to one year. The diffusion coefficients due to growing crack width increase in crack width but they decrease with increasing curing period, which yields 57.8–61.6% reduction at the age of 180 days and 21.5–26.6% of reduction at 365 days. Through the parameters of age and crack width which are obtained from regression analysis, the evaluation technique which can consider the effect of crack and time on diffusion is proposed for nuclear power plant concrete.
1 Introduction
Concrete is an attractive construction material which has many engineering merits like cost–benefit, stable supply system, fire resistance, and high durability despite of considerable CO_{2} emission during manufacturing of cement (Back et al. 2011). Concrete has an excellent radiation shielding performance and low thermal conductivity, so that it has been used for nuclear power plant construction (Lee et al. 2016a, b; ACI Committee 1996, 2009). The prestressed concrete (PSC) or reinforced concrete (RC) members are the commonly used in the nuclear industry, however these structures are affected by reinforcement corrosion when exposed to coastal environment (Broomfield 1997; Song et al. 2006). Nuclear power plants are usually located near to the sea due to the cooling waterintake and drainages. Even if the structures are not submerged or directly exposed to sea water, the chlorides intrude into concrete through diffusion and permeation, and it causes rapid steel corrosion (Broomfield 1997; Song et al. 2006; Win et al. 2004; Nguyen et al. 2017). Nuclear power plant system has a large dimension with massive system and concrete is placed at a large scale, so called, mass concrete. In the mass concrete, cracks easily occur due to the dimensional instability caused by drying shrinkage and hydration heat at early age (Lee et al. 2016a, b; Song et al. 2001; Kwon et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2016). The crack on the surface of the concrete allows more rapid intrusion of chlorides into the concrete and accelerates the initiation of corrosion. Many researches have performed the quantification of chloride intrusion in cracked concrete considering crack width (Yokozeki et al. 1998; Gerard and Marchand 2000), torturity of crack shape (Yang et al. 2017a, b), and the complicated models enhanced by the material behaviors in early aged concrete such as porosity and saturation have been proposed (Maekawa et al. 2003; Park et al. 2012a, b; Ishida et al. 2009).
The diffusion and permeation of chlorides decrease with time. The main reasons for reduction of chloride ingress can be summarized reduction of porosity which can block the chloride ion intrusion (Kwon et al. 2009; Thomas and Bamforth 1999), reduction of diffusion which makes the ion transport slow into the concrete (Yoon et al. 2017; Park et al. 2009), enhanced hydration which can make more absorption of chloride ions (Ishida et al. 2009; Leng et al. 2000), and decreasing gap of chloride ion concentration between the inner and outer boundary conditions which reduces the concentration gradient (Welty et al. 1989). The timedependent diffusion has been studied for a long time with considering changing properties of concrete but they are focused only on crackfree concrete (Thomas and Bamforth 1999; Lingjie et al. 2017). Crack width also changes with time due to the steady reaction of cement hydration and autohealing enhanced by relative humidity (Japan Society of Civil Engineering 2002).
The governing mechanism for chloride behavior can be formulated with Nernst–Einstein Equation and Fick’s 2nd Law, representatively. In the former formulation, the reduction in porosity and moisture transport are considered in flux term which handles diffusion and convention. The enhanced absorption of free chloride ions due to cement or supplementary cementitious material hydration is considered in ionmass conservation system (Maekawa et al. 2003; Ishida et al. 2009). Unlike the equation, Fick’s 2nd Law assumes steadystate condition which means constant inlet of chlorides from the surface chloride condition. In the equation, timeexponent is proposed for expressing the decreasing diffusion with time, which contains a referential period and diffusion coefficient, and effect of mineral admixtures like Fly Ash (FA), Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), and Silica Fume (SF) (Thomas and Bamforth 1999; Lingjie et al. 2017; Thomas and Bentz 2002).
In the present work, two concrete mix proportions for nuclear power plant are prepared and the accelerated chloride diffusion tests under steadystate condition are performed for concrete containing various crack width and curing periods up to 1 year. The results from the accelerated diffusion test are quantitatively analyzed with different crack width and curing period.
2 Outline of Test for Chloride Diffusion with Cracks
2.1 Mixing Proportions and Used Materials
Two different mix proportions with 4000 psi (N: 28 MPa) and 6000 psi (H: 41 MPa) are prepared and shown in Table 1. Tables 2 and 3 show the properties of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and FA, and the aggregates used for the investigation, respectively.
2.2 Test Procedure
2.2.1 Compressive Strength
The concrete samples with 100 mm diameter and 200 mm height were cast and cured for 56, 180, and 365 days. The standard compressive strength at the age of 28 days was planned but there was a delay in attaining the strength, so that strength at the age of 56 days was evaluated. The compressive strength test was performed referred to KS F 2406.
2.2.2 Accelerated Diffusion Coefficient Under SteadyState Condition in Cracked Concrete

(1)
Crack inducing
Before the accelerated diffusion test, crack was induced in the concrete disk samples with UTM. The standard samples with 200 mm height was cut to 100 mm and subjected to splitting test. The designed crack width was difficult to obtain through loading level, so that many cracking tests were carried out and the crack widths were grouped with 0.1 mm interval. The crack gauge was attached on the concrete surface perpendicular to cracking direction (loading direction), and the crack width was monitored with loading. The crack width increases with loading and slightly decreases after unloading. The crack width after fullyunloading was measured and the side was coated with epoxy resin except the top and bottom side for onedimensional flow of chloride transport. The photographs of crackinducing and width measurement are shown in Fig. 1.

(2)
Accelerated diffusion test under steady state condition
Diffusion coefficient from nonsteady state condition is very vulnerable to crack width since it reflects the local chloride penetration depth in the crack width, so that the enlarged diffusion coefficient reaches to 160 times for normal condition (Park et al. 2012a, b). In the work, the increasing diffusion coefficient from the total cracked concrete is to be monitored. Accelerated diffusion test in concrete with single crack was performed referred to ASTM 1202, under the steadystate condition. Diffusion coefficient was calculated through the results adopted by Andrade (1993). For the test, a 0.5 M solution of NaCl and 0.1 M solution of NaOH was used as the catholyte and anolyte in the migration cell, respectively (Andrade 1993). The diffusion coefficient was calculated using the following Eq. (1).
$$ D_{eff} = \frac{{RTit_{cl} l}}{{nF^{ 2} \Delta EAC_{cl} Z}} $$(1)where R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol), T is the absolute temperature (K), i, is the current (Amp), t_{ cl } is the transference number (0.4336 in the case of 0.1 M NaOH and 0.5 M NaCl), l, is the thickness of the sample (m), n is 1.0, F is Faraday’s constant (9.648 × 10^{4} J/V mol), ΔE is the applied potential (30 V), A is the crosssection of the concrete sample (m^{2}), Z is the ion valence, and C_{ cl } is the concentration of the chloride ions in the diffusion cell (mol/L). Figure 2, shows the photograph of diffusion test setup and concrete cylinders for chloride diffusion test under curing. The measured current rapidly increases with test initiation and keep stable after 1–2 days. The stable measurement is adopted and considered for diffusion coefficient calculation.
3 Evaluation of Time and Crack Effect on Diffusion
3.1 Changes in Compressive Strength with Ages
The compressive strength test results up to 1 year are shown in Fig. 3. Triplicate samples were tested and the average results were plotted. The N grade concrete has the compressive strength value of 39.7, 42.3, and 46.1 MPa after 56, 180, and 365 days, respectively. Those in the H grade have the compressive strength 56.8, 59.2, and 61.2 MPa at each curing period.
3.2 Changes in Diffusion Coefficient with Various Ages and Crack Width
The diffusion coefficients with various crack widths and curing periods are plotted in Fig. 4a, b considering strength level. From the figures, it is evaluated that N and H grade concrete show significantly increasing diffusion coefficients with growing crack width. The diffusion coefficient in sound concrete was found to be 3.93 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s, and it increased to 1.03 × 10^{−11} m^{2}/s and 1.91 × 10^{−11} m^{2}/s when the crack width was 0.4 and 0.7 mm at the age of 56 days respectively. The abovementioned chloride diffusion coefficients at 0.4 and 0.7 mm are 2.62 and 4.86 times greater than the control cases. By considering the curing period, the diffusion coefficients decreased to 2.43 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s at 0.02 mm of crack width, 4.64 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s at 0.4 mm of crack width, and 7.93 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s at 1.0 mm crack width at the age of 180 days of curing periods respectively. When the curing period is extended to 365 days, the diffusion coefficient gradually decreased to 1.27 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s in sound concrete, 2.05 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s at 0.4 mm of crack width, and 3.78 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s at 0.8 mm of crack width respectively. Even if the curing period is extended, the significantly enlarged diffusion coefficient is observed with growing crack width due to rapid chloride penetration in the crack width.
In the H grade at the age of 56 days, the diffusion coefficient in the sound concrete is observed to be 3.84 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s and it gradually increases with crack width. Between 0.4 and 0.5 mm and at 1.0 mm of crack width crack width, the chloride diffusion coefficient increased to 2.7 and threefold increase was observed at the age of 56 days. The increasing trend with curing period is similar as that in Ngrade concrete. At the age of 180 days, 1.3 and 2.9 times increase in diffusion coefficients were observed with increasing crack width to 0.4 and 1.0 mm. At the age of 365 days, diffusion coefficient is found to be 2.7 times higher than the sound concrete when the crack width reaches over 1.0 mm.
Earlier studies indicated that, the chloride diffusion coefficient was significantly increased to 150–160 times when the crack width reached to 0.4 mm under the nonsteady state condition. The results obtained from the nonsteady state conditions are not the diffusion over the entire cracked area since the chloride penetration depth is confined in the cracked section only (Park et al. 2012a, b). In the previous test under steadystate condition, 2.7–3.0 times increase in diffusion coefficient was observed, which is consistent with the present results in the concrete with 0.4 mm of crack width.
3.3 Quantification of the Effect of Crack Width and Age on Diffusion
In this section, quantification of crack and age effect on diffusion is performed. During the exposure period, the diffusion is reported to be nonlinearly increasing with crack width (Kwon et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2017a, b), so that the increasing ratios are analyzed with crack width in each curing period. Firstly the regression analysis with age is performed for the diffusion coefficient in sound concrete. The regression analysis can be drawn as Eq. (2), where \( A(t) \) and \( E \) show the parameters for age and crack effect on diffusion, respectively. The flowchart for quantification of diffusion behavior is shown in Fig. 5.
where \( D(w,t) \) and \( D_{0} \) are diffusion in cracked concrete with increasing period and sound concrete at the reference period.
The results of normalization in sound concrete for N and H grade are listed in Table 4 and plotted in Fig. 6, respectively. In the normalization of the results, the data over relative error of 100% is disregarded and calculated again.
From Fig. 6a for N grade, it is found that the gradient of \( A(t) \) is reduced from 1.000 at the reference period to 0.579 (at 180 days) and 0.267 (at 365 days) which shows a greater reduction of 26.7% when it reaches to 365 days. The parameter E has relatively small reduction from 0.9529 to 0.8498 (180 days) and 1.0149 (365 days). Figure 6b showing the results of H grade, it is found that \( A(t) \) also decreases from 1.000 to 0.616 (180 days), and 0.215 (326 days). Unlike a great reduction of parameter \( A(t) \) from N and H grade, crack parameter\( E \) slightly increases from 0.8366 (reference period: 56 days), 0.8419 (180 days), and 1.1116 (365 days). This indicates that the increase in crack width is not much affected by the curing period. In the previous test results of 3 days and 28 days (Park 2002), the increasing ratio of diffusion was strongly affected by crack width regardless of curing periods even in early aged condition. In order to evaluate the effect of time on diffusion, \( A(t) \) and \( E \) are plotted with curing period.
In Fig. 7, the effect of age on parameter of \( A(t) \) and \( E \) are shown, which shows a close linear relation of \( A(t) \) with time but relatively inconsistent relation of \( E \) regardless of mix proportions. When adopting the results from the regression analysis, \( A(t) \) and \( E \) can be formulated with curing period. \( A(t)_{N} \) and \( A(t)_{H} \) denote the time effect on diffusion coefficient in N and Hgrade concrete, respectively. The parameter \( E \) shows no clear relation with ages and has a level of 0.8366–1.4036, so that it is assumed as the average of each grade. \( E \) for Ngrade and Hgrade are evaluated to be 1.09 with 26.1% of coefficient of variation (COV) and 0.93 with 17.1% of COV, respectively. The effect of age can be written as Eqs. (3a) and (3b), which yields final equation like Eqs. (4a) and (4b) with merging Eq. (2).
The comparison of the test results is plotted in Fig. 8 where Fig. 8a, b shows the comparison of N and H grade, respectively. The diffusion coefficient contours covering age and crack width for N and H grade are shown in Fig. 9.
4 Conclusions
In this work, the effects of crack and age on diffusion coefficient in concrete for nuclear power plant are evaluated and simplified evaluation technique is proposed considering the effects of age and crack width. The conclusions from the study are as follows.

1.
At the age of 56 days, the N grade sound concrete without crack has the diffusion coefficient of 3.93 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s and it increases to 1.03 × 10^{−11} m^{2}/s and 1.91 × 10^{−11} m^{2}/s when the crack width reaches to 0.4 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively. With increasing curing age, the diffusion coefficient decreases to 4.64 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s (0.4 mm of crack width) and 7.93 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s (1.0 mm crack width) at 180 days of curing period. In the case of 365 days of curing period, they gradually decrease to 2.05 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s (0.4 mm of crack width) and 3.78 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s (0.8 mm of crack width) respectively.

2.
In H grade concrete (6000 psi), the diffusion coefficient of sound concrete (at the age of 56 days) is found to be 3.84 × 10^{−12} m^{2}/s and it gradually increases with crack width. Further the diffusion coefficient increases to 2.7 and 3.0 times between 0.4 and 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm of crack width, respectively.

3.
At the end of 1 year, the effect of age on diffusion can be independent on crack effect since the increasing diffusion due to crack width is not much affected regardless of strength grade and curing period. Even if the diffusion coefficients significantly increase due to growing crack width, they decreases with extended curing period, The enhanced diffusion coefficients due to increase in crack width decrease with similar reduction level with extension of curing period, which yields 57.8–61.6% reduction at the age of 180 days and 21.5–26.6% of reduction at 365 days with similar trend, respectively. Considering the two parameters (age and crack width), simple evaluation technique is proposed for chloride diffusion coefficient in cracked concrete for nuclear power plant.

4.
In the work, the results from 56 days are adopted to reference data. If reference diffusion coefficient is set to 28 days, the decreasing pattern is expected to be similar but the constant should be altered. With more data base of mix proportions, crack width, and curing period on diffusion coefficient, more reasonable evaluation technique can be derived considering interaction of crack and age on chloride diffusion.
References
ACI 304.3R96. (1996). Heavyweight concrete: Measuring, mixing, transporting, and placing. ACI Committee Report, pp. 1–8.
ACI 211.191. (2009). Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete. ACI Committee Report, pp. 1–7.
Andrade, C. (1993). Calculation of chloride diffusion coefficients in concrete from ionic migration measurement. Cement and Concrete Research, 23, 724–742.
Back, C. H., Tae, S. H., Roh, S. J., Lee, J. H., & Shin, S. W. (2011). A study on the requisite elements of LCCO2 evaluation system at planning stage of building. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 12(3), 31–41.
Broomfield, J. P. (1997). Corrosion of steel in concrete: understanding, investigation and repair (pp. 1–15). London: E&FN.
Gerard, B., & Marchand, J. (2000). Influence of cracking on the diffusion properties of cementbased materials Part I: Influence of continuous cracks on the steadystate regime. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(1), 37–43.
Ishida, T., Iqbal, P. O., & Anh, H. T. L. (2009). Modeling of chloride diffusivity coupled with nonlinear binding capacity in sound and cracked concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 39, 913–923.
Japan Society of Civil Engineering, Concrete Library 109. (2002). Proposal of the format for durability database of concrete.
Kwon, S. J., Na, U. J., Park, S. S., & Jung, S. H. (2009). Service life prediction of concrete wharves with earlyaged crack: Probabilistic approach for chloride diffusion. Structural Safety, 31, 75–83.
Lee, H. S., & Kwon, S. J. (2016). Effects of magnetite aggregate and steel powder on thermal conductivity and porosity in concrete for nuclear power plant. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 1–8.
Lee, Y., Cha, S. R., & Kim, J. K. (2016). Heat transfer and stress analysis of reactor containment building for various concrete mix proportions in severe weather conditions. In The 2016 World Congress: Structure Congress, IASEM, Jeju, Korea, pp. 1–14.
Leng, F., Feng, N., & Lu, X. (2000). An experiment study on the properties of resistance to diffusion of chloride ions of fly ash and blast furnace slag concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(6), 989–992.
Lingjie, Wu, Li, Wei, & Xiaoniu, Yu. (2017). Timedependent chloride penetration in concrete in marine environments. Construction and Building Materials, 152, 406–413.
Maekawa, K., Ishida, T., & Kishi, T. (2003). Multiscale modeling of structural concrete (1st ed., pp. 291–352). London: Tylor & Francis.
Nguyen, P. T., Arteaga, E. B., Amiri, Q., & EI Soueidy, C.P. (2017). An efficient chloride ingress model for longterm lifetime assessment of reinforced concrete structures under realistic climate and exposure conditions. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 11(2), 199–213.
Park S. S. (2002). Evaluation of earlyage crack and chloride transport in concrete exposed to chloride attack. Dissertation of Ph.D., Yonsei University South Korea.
Park, S. S., Kwon, S.J., & Kim, T.S. (2009). An experimental study on the durability characterization using porosity. Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineering, 29(2A), 171–179.
Park, S. S., Kwon, S. J., & Jung, S. H. (2012a). Analysis technique for chloride penetration in cracked concrete using equivalent diffusion and permeation. Construction and Building Materials, 29, 183–192.
Park, S. S., Kwon, S. J., Jung, S. H., & Lee, S. W. (2012b). Modeling of water permeability in early aged concrete with cracks based on micro pore structure. Construction and Building Materials, 27(1), 597–604.
Song, H. W., Cho, H. J., Park, S. S., Byun, K. J., & Maekawa, K. (2001). Earlyage cracking resistance evaluation of concrete structure. Concrete Science and Engineering, 3, 62–72.
Song, H. W., Pack, S. W., Lee, C. H., & Kwon, S. J. (2006). Service life prediction of concrete structures under marine environment considering coupled deterioration. Journal of Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, 12(4), 265–284.
Thomas, M. D. A., & Bamforth, P. B. (1999). Modeling chloride diffusion in concrete: Effect of fly ash and slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(4), 487–495.
Thomas, M. D. A. & Bentz, E. C. (2002). Computer program for predicting the service life and lifecycle costs of reinforced concrete exposed to chlorides. In Life365 Manual, SFA, pp. 12–56.
Welty, J. R., Wicks, C. M., & Wilson, R. E. (1989). Fundamental of momentum, heat, and mass transfer. New York: Wiley.
Win, P. P., Watanabe, M., & Machida, A. (2004). Penetration profile of chloride ion in cracked reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(7), 1073–1079.
Yang, K.H., Mun, J.S., Kim, D.G., & Cho, M.S. (2016). Comparison of strengthmaturity models accounting for hydration heat in massive walls. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10(1), 47–60.
Yang, K.H., Cheon, J. H., & Kwon, S.J. (2017a). Modeling of chloride diffusion in concrete considering wedgeshaped single crack and steadystate condition. Computers and Concrete, 19(2), 211–216.
Yang, K.H., Singh, J. K., Lee, B. Y., & Kwon, S.J. (2017b). Simple technique for tracking chloride penetration in concrete based on the crack and width under steadystate conditions. Sustainability, 9(2), 1–14.
Yokozeki, K., Okada, K., Tsutsumi, T., & Watanabe, K. (1998). Prediction of the service life of RC with crack exposed to chloride attack. Japan Symposium of Rehabilitation of Concrete Structure, 10(1), 1–6.
Yoon, Y. S., Park, J. S., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). Evaluation of relationship between strength and resistance to chloride in concrete containing fly Ash with ages. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection (accepted).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2015R1A5A1037548). The authors also appreciate for the support by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20151520101090).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, SH., Ryu, HS., Karthick, S. et al. Time and Crack Effect on Chloride Diffusion for Concrete with Fly Ash. Int J Concr Struct Mater 12, 14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s4006901802302
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s4006901802302