Skip to main content

Automated Detection of Surface Cracks and Numerical Correlation with Thermal-Structural Behaviors of Fire Damaged Concrete Beams

Abstract

There are two specific aims in this study; first is to develop and validate an automated crack detection technique for the fire damaged beam. Second is to investigate whether the detected crack information and thermal-structural behaviors can be numerically related. To fulfill the aims, fire tests and residual strength tests are conducted on RC beams having different fire exposure time periods and sustained load levels. To detect the automated cracks, surface images of the fire damaged beam surfaces are taken with digital cameras and an automatic crack detection method is developed using a convolutional neural network (CNN) which is a deep learning technique primarily used for analyzing intricate structures of high-dimensional data [such as high definition (HD) images and videos]. The quantity of cracks detected using the proposed CNN changes depending on the test variables, and the changing trends are similar to those of the crack lengths obtained from the optical observation. Additionally, it is found that the quantity of the automatically detected cracks is numerically related to the temperatures inside the beams as well as the stiffnesses obtained from the residual strength tests.

1 Introduction

Although concrete is known as a thermal resistant material, concrete structures are damaged when exposed to fire. To repair or reuse the structures after the fire, it is important to estimate and quantify damages accurately and promptly. One of the common investigation methods is optical observation of crack and deformation from the fire damaged structures. It would be cost effective if such optical observation is done quantitatively without requiring expensive testing machines or man power. Moreover, it would be very powerful if the crack information can be used as a guide to evaluate the performance of fire damaged concrete structures.

The visual assessment methods of fire damaged concrete have been focused on investigations of color change, deflection, and cracking/spalling of the surface. In the studies by Short et al. (2001) and Guise (1997), color image analysis is used to investigate changes in color for concrete subjected to elevated temperatures. Hager (2014) also investigates color change of ordinary and high-performance concretes upon heating using an image analysis software package (Scion image v. 4.0.3). Toumi and Resheidat (2010) analyze quantification of surface cracking of concrete heated to different temperatures ranging from 105 °C to 1250 °C using an image scanning technique. On the other hands, there is a study about concrete specimens with pre-made cracks to investigate the effect of cracks on temperature distributions after earthquake fire (Wu et al. 2014). Xu et al. (2003) focus on the effect of binder (w/b) ratios and PFA dosages on cracking of concretes. Kim et al. (2013) investigate evolution of temperature-induced discontinuities at the sub-millimeter level and the cause of physical changes in heated mortar specimens (such as pore structure and density prevail) using high-performance X-ray computed tomography (CT), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Regarding crack detection, various image processing and analysis techniques have been applied to detect edge information in fire damaged concrete structures. Li et al. (2018b) develop an edge detection algorithm using a local binary pattern (LBP) algorithm. They then analyze including the lengths and widths of the cracks. Other edge detection algorithms based on generic programming (Nishikawa et al. 2012) and Gabor filters (Zalama et al. 2014) have been used for identifying major cracks in surface images of concretes. However, hand-crafted image features are limited in the evaluation of fire damaged reinforced concrete (RC) beams as the structures have smoke particles on the surfaces and a large amount of noise similar to thin cracks. Furthermore, illumination differences in the acquisition significantly impacts reliable image feature extraction.

The convolutional neural network (CNN) is a deep learning technique that is primarily used for analyzing intricate structures of high-dimensional data such as high definition (HD) images and videos (LeCun et al. 2015). CNNs have a common structure that consists of cascaded convolutional layers and pooling layers ending with fully connected layers. Operating units called neurons are arranged to have feature maps and are connected to local patches to convolve the neurons of the previous layers. The learned image features from CNNs are known to be more robust and reliable to noise than hand-crafted features when a large database is available for training the models. Accordingly, advanced deep learning techniques are actively studied in damage assessments using image analysis of RC beams. Cha et al. (2017) use a CNN that can train image features to detect concrete cracks in an end-to-end manner. Lin et al. (2017) demonstrate significantly improved accuracies for localizing damaged areas in a structure when using automatically extracted image features from the CNN model. However, researches on the detection and utilization of cracks for fire damaged structural members have not been comprehensively studied. One of the reasons may be because it takes too long time and manpower to measure cracks quantitatively, especially when there are too many cracks on the concrete surface due to fire.

Therefore, this study proposes a machine learning technique to detect cracks from the fire damaged concrete. In addition, numerical correlations between the detected cracks and thermal-structural behaviors of the fire damaged beams are presented. For the study, fire tests are performed on the RC beams having different fire exposure time periods and sustained load levels. The automatic crack detection method is developed and validated with the crack length obtained using optical observation. Residual strength tests are also conducted to measure maximum load bearing capacity and stiffness of the fire damaged beams.

2 Method

2.1 Details of Test Specimens

Five RC beams are fabricated with dimensions of 250 × 400 × 5000 mm (width × depth × length) as listed in Table 1. Three steel bars (diameter = 19 mm) are located in the bottom of the beams and stirrups with 150 mm spacing are used to prevent shear failure as shown in Fig. 1. Variables of this study are fire exposure time and sustained load level. During the fire tests, specimens are subjected to sustained loads of 4.82 tonf, 7.23 tonf, or 9.65 tonf, which correspond to 40, 60, or 80% of the nominal moment of the specimen, respectively. All the specimens are cured for 4 months at room temperature and then preheated at 200–300 °C for 2 h to prevent moisture effects during the fire test. After the fire test, the fire damaged beams are subjected to residual strength tests to measure maximum load bearing capacities and stiffnesses.

Table 1 List of specimens.
Fig. 1
figure 1

Details of specimens (unit: mm) (a) Cross sectional view, (b) Front view.

Table 2 shows the mixing proportion of concrete and the mechanical properties of the concrete and steel bars used in the RC beams are obtained from material tests; the compressive strength of concrete is found to be 25 MPa and the tensile strength is measured as 3 MPa after 28 days of curing at room temperature (see Table 3). The strength and elastic modulus of the reinforcing bar are 448 MPa and 205 GPa, respectively.

Table 2 Mixture proportion for concrete.
Table 3 Material properties of concrete and steel.

2.2 Test Setup and Data Measurements

During fire tests, beams are loaded with a four-point loading system. Effective span is 4700 mm and distance between the two loading points is 1200 mm. After the certain level of load is applied, the beams are heated on three surfaces of the specimens (one bottom and two side surfaces) according to the time–temperature heating curve developed by the International Standard Organization (ISO), as illustrated in Fig. 2. Temperatures inside the beam are obtained from thermocouples located at a bottom corner of a cross section (which is 40 mm away from the both bottom and side heated surfaces). In order to see if the temperature varies along the beam length, two thermocouples are located at mid span and 1/4 span (as shown in Fig. 3). After the fire tests, maximum load bearing capacities as well as stiffnesses of the fire damaged beams are obtained from the residual strength tests. Loading points and support conditions for the residual strength test are the same as those used in the fire tests. Detailed locations of loading, strain and deflection measurements for residual strength tests are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

ISO 834 time–temperature heating curve.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Set-up and detail of thermocouple and LVDT.

2.3 The Crack Detection Method

2.3.1 Image Data Acquisition and Pre-processing

Immediately after the fire test, surface images of the fire damaged beams are taken by digital camera. First, the side surfaces of fire damaged beams are divided into 10 zones along the length. Then, the camera takes pictures of each zone while moving in a sideways direction on a tripod which is kept at a distance of 2 m from the beam surface. Because the CNNs process the concrete images patch by patch, each zone is divided into a number of image patches (as shown in Fig. 4). The resolution of the image patch is set to 540 × 540 pixels and corresponds to an area of 50 × 50 mm2 on the concrete beam. In other words, a size of one pixel becomes 0.09 × 0.09 mm2. It is noted that the crack detection algorithm can analyze an image patch at high resolution of about 0.6 mm pixel size and the presented algorithm uses higher precision in the edge analysis. Some outliers are removed if the image patch contained undesired artifacts such as paint. To confirm that the proposed CNNs detect cracks properly, surface cracks are also drawn manually from the imported surface images through CAD and the total lengths of the surface cracks are obtained.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Image data acquisitions and pre-processing.

2.3.2 Proposed CNN Method

A two-streamed CNN architecture is introduced in the authors’ previous work (Kim et al. 2018) and developed to detect the edges with high-fidelity in the fire damaged RC beams considering threshold values. Since the pixels of the image have wide range of intensity values from 0 to 255, threshold is used to set criteria of pixel intensity to be recognized as cracks. After the input concrete image passes through the CNN model, the output image, called the fire-damage-prediction-image (FDPI), is generated at the end of the network. The FDPI is supposed to include important cracks used for safety evaluation. The proposed CNN uses Convolution-Deconvolution architecture as shown in Fig. 5. Specifically, the series of convolution layers colored blue in Fig. 5 are used to extract the trained image features reflecting the length, thickness, or overall shapes used for distinguishing real cracks from noise. The convolution layers find whether the primitive image features that actively respond to cracks reside in the concrete image. The pooling layers colored with light blue perform down-sampling of the input feature maps so that the same filter kernel can see larger scopes and reduce the complexity. The convolution and the pooling layers provide output latent vectors. Meanwhile, the deconvolution layers (colored orange) reconstruct the region-of-interest from the feature maps and the latent vectors. Un-pooling layers increase the size of the feature maps to that of the original image (as opposed to the pooling layers).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Crack detection algorithm based on two-streamed convolutional neural networks using weighting feature network and low-level feature network. (color figure online).

The model presented here differs from previous CNN-based edge detection algorithms (Cha et al. 2017; Xie and Tu 2017) in that the proposed network uses two-streamed CNNs consisting of so-called a weighting feature network and a low-level feature network. The motivation for these architectural changes is to provide both abstract and primitive information in crack detection. In CNNs, the convolution layers train hierarchical features with respect to the different levels. The layers closer to the input layer provide more primitive image representations such as lines and blobs. In contrast, the layers closer to the output layer provide more abstract representations. The low-level features can be efficiently used for edge detection algorithms (Cha et al. 2017; Xie and Tu 2017) because the cracks are formed with composites of lines and other low-level features. However, the features can be too sensitive to noise or some color changes (especially when the RC beams suffer from fire-damage). To alleviate these problems, our model incorporates a weighting feature network to find a wider range of cracks using the convolution-deconvolution structure. The weighting feature network produces high pixel intensities in an image to indicate an important region of cracks. At the end of the network, element-wise multiplication is used to combine the two feature maps from both the weighting feature network and the low-level feature network. This is so that the FDPI can capture only the critical cracks that can play a key role in the safety evaluation. It is also shown in Fig. 5 that the low-level feature network uses a skipping path with elementwise addition to deliver the low-level features to the deconvolution layers so that the information is not lost in the end of the network. The method is motivated by previous studies to achieve precise localization with CNNs (Ronneberger et al. 2015).

2.3.3 Training and Testing

The proposed network model is implemented using Caffe software framework based on C++ (Jia et al. 2014). Training and testing are performed with a NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 graphic processing unit (GPU), Intel@3.5GHzX8 CPU, and 32 GB memory. Data sets of ~ 88,000 natural images and ~ 20,000 RC beam images are used for training the parameters (Li et al. 2014; Yan et al. 2013). Our model is first initialized using pre-trained parameters from Imagenet datasets (Russakovsky et al. 2015) and further trained with other natural images such as VOC (Everingham et al. 2015) and BSDS (Martin et al. 2001) datasets, which are widely used for edge detection and saliency detection. Afterwards, the CNN model is fine-tuned using crack images. Especially, the images of RC beams are prepared by dividing surface images of various fire damaged beams into small patches with size of 50 × 50mm2. However, the annotation per-pixel of all the training images requires a lot of human labors and costs. Therefore, this study uses semi-supervised learning with pseudo-labels that have been effectively used in a saliency detection problem (Li et al. 2018a). The training procedure is shown in detail; in the first round, input of the training samples are fed into the saliency detection network and some of the output samples are chosen if they display results close to the actual cracks. It is noted that the intermediate outputs sometimes have pore structures or noises since the network is not originally developed for the crack detection. Thus, in the second round, the undesired structures are removed in manual so that only the cracks remain in the samples. The steps are iteratively done, and ~ 2000 pseudo training samples are obtained. Moreover, we also create ~ 300 ground-truth training samples by manually tracing cracks to conduct further fine-tuning and ~ 200 ground-truth testing samples. The training and testing images are not overlapped. The parameters are trained with the standard back-propagation algorithm (LeCun et al. 2015).

For training, a cost function J is defined as the mean squared error function between the predicted edge image and the original edge (ground truth) as follows:

$$J = \frac{1}{2}||O - {H_w}(I)||_2^2$$
(1)

where \(O\) is the ground truth of FDPI, \({H_w}\) is the network function, \(w\) is the network parameter set, and \(I\) is the input concrete RC image. The loptimal network parameter set \({w^*}\) are trained to minimize the cost function, given as:

$${w^*} = \arg \min J(w)$$
(2)

The optimization in (2) can be accomplished using the back-propagation algorithm. The network parameters are updated with the mini-batch stochastic gradient descent algorithm, as in the study (Lee et al. 2017):

$${w_n} = {w_{n - 1}} + \xi \frac{\partial }{{\partial w}}J(w)$$
(3)

where \(\xi\) is the learning rate. The learning rate is set to 10−2, which is kept constant during the training. The training is stopped after 10K iterations. In the fine-tuning, the learning rate is the same, but the training is stopped after 5K iterations.

2.4 Crack Detection

Figure 6 reveals the representative results from the weighting feature network and the low-level feature network when the two different types of input images are given. The first column represents the original crack images. The second, third, and fourth columns represent the corresponding outputs of the weighting feature network, the low-level feature network, and the final combined network, respectively. The weighting feature network captures the region where the important cracks exist, which can be seen in the second column. As compared to the first row, the second row rejects most of the regions whose pixel intensities in the weighting feature network are nearly zero. This observation confirms that there are no distinct cracks in the second row. For the outputs shown in the third column, the low-level feature network detects the fine edge information that has been not captured in the weighting feature network. Combining both images in the last column, the FDPI shows the important crack information in final output. Figure 7 is a black-white inverted image of P1-60 specimen obtained from the proposed CNN model, showing detected cracks and edges of pore in black lines.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Examples of input crack images in the first column and the output images from weighting feature network, low-level feature network, and the final output in the second, third, and fourth column, respectively (Kim et al. 2018).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Result of the proposed CNN method for specimen P1-60.

In order to validate the crack detection method, surface cracks on RC beams are drawn using AutoCAD (Autodesk Inc, San Rafael, CA) from optical observation as illustrated in Fig. 8a–e. The surface cracks are dispersed over the heated surfaces and observed more in the lower part than in the upper part. Compared to Fig. 8a, crack lines detected from Fig. 7 are similar to those obtained from optical observation. For the more quantitative comparison, total lengths of the cracks obtained from the optical observations are calculated using AutoCAD as listed in Table 4. As shown in the table, the number of pixels of the crack parts obtained from the proposed CNN model is compared with the total crack lengths obtained from optical observation. Since the CNN method gives output in a form of number of pixels, direct comparison between the results from the CNN model and the optical observation is not possible. One may insist that the area of cracked part can be calculated by multiplying the number of pixels with the area of one pixel. Then the crack length obtained from the optical observation also need to be transferred into the area of cracked part by multiplying with the crack width. From an image patch of 50 × 50 mm2 of the fire damaged beam surface (Fig. 9), it is found that the widths of the cracks are widely varied from 0.1 to 0.9 mm. Due to its wide variation and large number of cracks, it would be time consuming to measure width of each crack manually and is difficult to average them properly. Instead, this study investigates the ratio of the number of pixels obtained from the CNN model to the crack length obtained from the optical observation, in order to see if consistency of the ratios can be found. It is interesting to note that the ratios in Table 4 are almost same among the specimens having different variables. This tells that the proposed CNN method recognizes cracks of the fire damaged concrete beams from the surface images and follows similar changing tendencies of total crack lengths obtained from the optical observations.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Surface cracks of specimens from optical observation (a) P1-60, (b) P1-120, (c) P2-60, (d) P2-120, (e) P3-60.

Table 4 The number of pixels recognized as cracks from the proposed CNN model and the total crack length obtained from optical observation.
Fig. 9
figure 9

Surface cracks of specimens from optical observation.

Considering that the number of pixels for the cracked part corresponds to approximately 15–17% of the heated surfaces, the proposed CNN method likely recognizes the more area as cracked than the actual cracks. This is because the proposed CNN still detects pore edges and recognizes as cracks regardless of using weighting network, when the pores are relatively large and clear as shown in Fig. 10a, b. Since threshold is often used to remove such noises, Table 5 includes test results of the CNN model with various threshold values of 0, 100, 180, and 200 in order to see if the threshold is capable of excluding detection of pore edges. Implementation of threshold drastically reduces the number of pixels as shown in Table 5. Specifically, the number of pixels decreases by almost 60% as the threshold value increases from 100 to 200, which shows that the implementation of threshold is an effective method to reduce the number of pixels by excluding detection of pore edges. However, Table 5 also shows that orders of specimens based on the number of pixels change, when the threshold is used. This is because the implementation of threshold excludes detection of some micro cracks dispersed on the damaged beam surfaces as well as detection of pore edges. Implementation of threshold can rather be suggested when the concrete surface has relatively large major cracks with minor number of noises. Instead, this study finds number of pixels for pore edges by using the proposed CNN model from the images of unheated concrete surfaces. Then, number of pixels for pore edges is subtracted from the number of pixels recognized as cracks from the proposed CNN model. This method allows excluding detection of initial defects such as noises and pores without using thresholds improves accuracy of the crack detection results of the proposed CNN model. Table 6 lists numbers of pixels excluding pore edges, which show similar trends as the total crack lengths obtained from the optical observations. Moreover, the area of detected cracks from the proposed CNN model reduces as 4.7–7.4% of the heated surfaces.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Examples of original and detected images of pores from unheated beam surface (a) Original image of unheated beam surface, (b) Edge detection from the proposed CNN model.

Table 5 CNN results depending on various threshold values.
Table 6 CNN results excluding edges of pores.

The proposed CNN model needs about 6.3 min of computational loads to detect cracks and store the results as shown in Fig. 7, while it takes days for one person to manually draw crack lines of the fire damaged beam surface (i.e. Fig. 8a) from optical observation. Even considering time to take photos of the fire damaged beam surfaces for image processing, the proposed CNN model is able to save time significantly to detect cracks of the fire damaged concrete beams. Other advantages of using the proposed CNN model are; the model gives objective results, and does not require expensive inspection tools or man power but commonly used digital camera and a computer.

3 Discussion

This section discusses the numerical correlation between the cracks and thermal-structural behaviors of the fire damaged beams in order to see if the detected crack information can be used as one of the fire damage evaluation indices. The hypothesis of choosing crack as fire damage evaluation index is that even if both loading and fire cause cracks in the beam, cracks occurred by loading accelerate heat propagation through the cracks and the accelerated heat propagation eventually causes increase of temperature as well as thermally induced cracks. First, the relationship between the crack lengths of localized areas and the concrete temperature of the corresponding locations is illustrated in Fig. 11. As shown, the crack length and the concrete temperature at localized area are not directly matched because the cracks in the localized area cannot represent overall behaviors of fire damaged beams, whereas the overall behaviors are highly influenced by temperature exposure. Instead, Fig. 12 shows that total crack lengths of fire damaged beams have much better correlation as R2 = 0.96 with the concrete temperatures measured at mid span. Therefore, it can be concluded that total crack lengths of the beam surfaces are highly influenced by the concrete temperatures. Likely, the number of pixels detected using the proposed CNN has a strong correlation to the concrete temperature as R2 = 0.91, as shown in Fig. 13. It is found that R2 value for temperature-total crack length curve (Fig. 12) is slightly higher than R2 value for temperature-the number of pixels curve (Fig. 13). The difference of R2 values may be because of the proposed CNN model tends to recognize all edges of micro cracks dispersed on concrete surfaces as fire induced cracks, while only major cracks are counted from the optical observation. Nonetheless, it can be said that the numbers of pixels obtained from the proposed CNN model are correlated with temperatures as good as obtained from the optical observation, because both R2 values are higher than 0.9.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Correlation between temperatures and crack lengths obtained from the optical observation at different locations.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Correlation between temperatures and total crack lengths obtained from the optical observation.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Correlation between temperatures and the number of pixels from the proposed CNN model.

From the residual strength tests, maximum load bearing capacities and initial stiffness values (Sullivan et al. 2004; Ryu et al. 2018) of the fire damaged RC beams are also obtained and compared with the number of pixels as listed in Table 7. It is interesting to note that the differences in maximum loads between the fire damaged specimens are small. For example, specimen P1-120 shows the lowest maximum load among the specimens but the maximum difference is only about 5% compared to the P2-60 specimen. This is because the maximum load bearing capacities of the beams are highly governed by the reinforcing steel bars and the strength of the steel bars does not show significant decrease at the temperatures under 500 °C. Rather than the maximum loads, the differences of the initial stiffness of the fire damaged RC beams having different fire exposure time and sustained load level are relatively large due to damages of the concrete. Therefore, this study investigates the relationship between the number of pixels and stiffness of fire damaged beams from Fig. 14. The figure shows that there is an obvious decrease of stiffness with increase of number of pixels with high correlation as R2 = 0.91, and the number of pixels can also be related to structural behaviors of fire damaged beams.

Table 7 Fire test and residual strength test results (Ryu et al. 2018) compared with number of pixels obtained from the proposed CNN model.
Fig. 14
figure 14

Correlation between stiffness and the number of pixels from the proposed CNN model.

The detailed results depending on the test variables can be found from Table 7. Specifically, the number of crack pixels of fire damaged beams tends to increase with the fire exposure time. The number of crack pixels is 11,683,021 for the P1 specimen heated for 1 h, while the number of crack pixels is 17,638,559 for P1 specimen heated for 2 h. In the case of specimens loaded with 60% of their nominal moments, the numbers of crack pixels are 13,619,863 and 18,303,122 for P2-60 and P2-120 specimens, respectively. P1 and P2 series show that the numbers of crack pixels of the beams heated for 2 h are about 34% and 51% larger than those of the beams heated for 1 h, respectively. The number of crack pixels is also affected by the sustained load levels, because the beam loaded with the higher ratio of the nominal moment causes more cracks and the concrete temperature also increases. However, the differences of numbers of crack pixels due to different sustained load levels are relatively small. For example, a change in the numbers of crack pixels between the specimens P1-60 to P2-60 is about 17% and the change between P2-60 to P3-60 is about 10%. Therefore, it can be said that the temperature and the number of crack pixels show similar increasing tendency when the sustained load level increases, but the differences are small.

Detailed information in Table 7 also shows that the number of pixels increases and stiffness decreases with increase of fire exposure time and sustained load level. When comparing P1-60 specimen and P1-120 specimen, the reduction rate of stiffness is about 19% and the numbers of crack pixels increase about 51% with increase of fire exposure time from 60 to 120 min. When comparing P1-60 specimen to P2-60 specimen, stiffness reduces about 9% and the number of crack pixels increases about 17% due to increase of sustained load level from 40 to 60%.

4 Conclusions

This study proposes a CNN based method to detect cracks in fire damaged beams automatically and investigates whether there are numerical correlations between the detected crack information and thermal-structural behaviors of the fire damaged concrete beams. The following conclusions are drawn:

  1. 1.

    The crack information of the fire damaged concrete beams obtained from the proposed CNN model agrees well with the crack information obtained from the optical observation.

  2. 2.

    The temperatures obtained from the thermocouples inside the beams are significantly related to total crack lengths of fire damaged beams rather than crack lengths at each zone. Also, there are strong relationships between the temperature and the number of pixels obtained from the proposed CNN model.

  3. 3.

    No significant differences in the maximum load bearing capacities of the fire damaged RC beams are found because undamaged reinforcing steel bars play a major role under bending. However, initial stiffness of the fire damaged RC beam differs depending on the test variables considerably due to damages of the concrete. When compared with number of pixels obtained from the proposed CNN model, changing trend of stiffness among the tested specimens is similar to that of number of pixels obtained from the proposed CNN model in general.

  4. 4.

    The limitation of this study is that the proposed CNN model is not able to capture crack depth and width. Nonetheless the number of pixels is related to thermal-structural behaviors to some degree.

References

  • Cha, Y., Choi, W., & Büyüköztürk, O. (2017). Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,32(5), 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everingham, M., Eslami, S. A., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2015). The pascal visual object classes challenge: A retrospective. International Journal of Computer Vision,111(1), 98–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guise, S. E. (1997). Use of colour image analysis for assessment of fire damaged concrete. Birmingham: Aston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, I. (2014). Colour change in heated concrete. Fire Technology,50(4), 945–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., & Darrell, T. (2014). Caffe: convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on multimedia.

  • Kim, H., Ryu, E., Lee, Y., Kang, J., & Lee, J. (2018). Performance evaluation of fire damaged reinforced concrete beams using machine learning. In Proceedings of ICCCBE 2018.

  • Kim, K., Yun, T., & Park, K. (2013). Evaluation of pore structures and cracking in cement paste exposed to elevated temperatures by X-ray computed tomography. Cement and Concrete Research,50, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature,521(7553), 436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Kang, M., & Kang, J. (2017). Ensemble of binary tree structured deep convolutional network for image classification. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific signal and information processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), 2017.

  • Li, G., Xie, Y., & Lin, L. (2018). Weakly supervised salient object detection using image labels. In Proceedings of the 32th AAAI Conference on artificial intelligence.

  • Li, L., Wang, Q., Zhang, G., Shi, L., Dong, J., & Jia, P. (2018a). A method of detecting the cracks of concrete undergo high-temperature. Construction and Building Materials,162, 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Hou, X., Koch, C., Rehg, J. M., & Yuille, A. L. (2014). The secrets of salient object segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.

  • Lin, Y., Nie, Z., & Ma, H. (2017). Structural damage detection with automatic feature-extraction through deep learning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,32(12), 1025–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., & Malik, J. (2001). A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics 2001. In Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on computer vision.

  • Nishikawa, T., Yoshida, J., Sugiyama, T., & Fujino, Y. (2012). Concrete crack detection by multiple sequential image filtering. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,27(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention.

  • Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., et al. (2015). Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision,115(3), 211–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, E., Shin, Y., & Kim, H. (2018). Effect of loading and beam sizes on the structural behaviors of reinforced concrete beams under and after fire. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials,12(1), 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, N., Purkiss, J., & Guise, S. (2001). Assessment of fire damaged concrete using colour image analysis. Construction and Building Materials,15(1), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T., Calvi, G., & Priestley, M. (2004). Initial stiffness versus secant stiffness in displacement based design. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference of earthquake engineering (WCEE).

  • Toumi, B., & Resheidat, M. (2010). Influence of high temperatures on surface cracking of concrete studied by image scanning technique. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering,4(2), 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Xiong, W., & Wen, B. (2014). Thermal fields of cracked concrete members in fire. Fire Safety Journal,66, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, S., & Tu, Z. (2017). Holistically-nested edge detection. International Journal of Computer Vision,125(1–3), 3–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Wong, Y., Poon, C., & Anson, M. (2003). Influence of PFA on cracking of concrete and cement paste after exposure to high temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research,33(12), 2009–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Q., Xu, L., Shi, J., & Jia, J. (2013). Hierarchical saliency detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.

  • Zalama, E., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., Medina, R., & Llamas, J. (2014). Road crack detection using visual features extracted by Gabor filters. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(5), 342–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Technology Advancement Research Program (TARP) funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [17CTAP-C114986-02]. This work was supported by a grant from Urban Architecture Research Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [19AUDP-B100356-05].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contribute equally. Especially, ER conducted tests and analyzed the results. JK and JL wrote in-house code for detecting cracks. YS planned test method and variables. HK modified crack detecting method by correlating detected crack amount with the test results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heesun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Journal information: ISSN 1976-0485 / eISSN 2234-1315

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryu, E., Kang, J., Lee, J. et al. Automated Detection of Surface Cracks and Numerical Correlation with Thermal-Structural Behaviors of Fire Damaged Concrete Beams. Int J Concr Struct Mater 14, 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0387-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0387-3

Keywords