 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
LongTerm Flexural Behaviour of Cracked Reinforced Concrete Beams with Recycled Aggregate
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials volume 16, Article number: 19 (2022)
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an investigation into the longterm flexural behaviour of cracked reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) beams. Washed construction and demolition wastes (CDW) with a maximum size of 20 mm were used as the coarse recycled aggregate. The main variable in the research was the replacement ratio of recycled aggregate. Specimens with 0%, 50% and 100% recycled aggregate were cast and tested. The experimental results showed that samples with an increased amount of recycled aggregate had significantly reduced strength and a noticeable increase in both shortterm and longterm deflection of RAC beams over equivalent normal concrete (NC) beams. Increased levels of RA resulted in greater creep and shrinkage of RAC and greater longterm loss of tension stiffening in RAC reinforced tension specimens. Prediction of longterm deflections using Eurocode 2, even after incorporating the experimental concrete properties within the Code method, underestimated the experimental deflections of the RAC beams. However, by modifying the tension stiffening factor, β used in Eurocode 2, deflections were predicted to within approximately 1%. From this investigation, it is recommended that the factor β be reduced from 0.5 (for NC) to 0.4 (for RAC @50% replacement) and 0.3 (for RAC @100% replacement).
Introduction
Concrete is the most common structural material and has been used in all types of construction work. It has been reported that approximately 10 billion tonnes of concrete are consumed annually worldwide, the corresponding quantity of aggregate, which is the main component of concrete, is in the range of 8–12 billion tonnes (Brito & Saikia, 2012; Kishore, 2007).
Besides the environmental concern posed by the CO_{2} emissions from cement production, the continued growth in demand for concrete raises other concerns: first, the availability of the natural resources for its component materials and second, the vast size of the landfills required for disposing of the construction and demolition waste. These factors mean that concrete is not an environmentally friendly construction material. Therefore, a significant amount of research (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz, 2007; Arezoumandi et al., 2015; American Concrete Institute, 2004; Brito and Saikia, 2012; Etxeberria et al., 2007; Ignjatović et al., 2013; Kishore, 2007; KosiorKazberuk and Grzywa, 2014; Maruyama et al., 2004; Rahal, 2007; Sato et al., 2007; Sryh and Forth, 2015; Yang et al., 2008) has been conducted to assess how construction and demolition wastes (CDW) can be reused as recycled aggregate (RA) for producing recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) and also how to use RAC for structural applications. There has been little research on the serviceability behaviour of reinforced concrete incorporating CDW; much of the general research in this area (Brito & Saikia, 2012; Juan & Gutiérrez, 2009; Knaack & Kurama, 2015; Łapko & Grygo, 2010; Malešev et al., 2010) has used recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) only.
Previous research (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz, 2007; American Concrete Institute, 2004; Arezoumandi et al. 2014, 2015; Brito and Saikia, 2012; British Standards Institution, 2004; Choi and Yun, 2013; Etxeberria et al., 2007; Ignjatović et al., 2013; Juan and Gutiérrez, 2009; Kishore, 2007; Knaack and Kurama, 2015; KosiorKazberuk and Grzywa, 2014; Łapko and Grygo, 2010; Malešev et al., 2010; Maruyama et al., 2004; Michaud et al., 2016; Rahal, 2007; Sato et al., 2007; Sryh and Forth, 2015; Wardeh and Ghorbel, 2019; Xiao et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2008) has shown that all the types of recycled aggregate in general has a greater effect on the timedependent deformation than on the shortterm behaviour and strength properties of concrete. There is a noticeable increase in creep and shrinkage when any type of RA is incorporated in concrete, which affects the longterm flexural behaviour of concrete structures. To date, the influence of the different types of RA on tension stiffening over time, which is a parameter required to calculate longterm deflections, has not been addressed.
Background
In order to determine the scope for the future use of RA as a construction material, the physical and mechanical properties of RAC have attracted a significant amount of interest in recent research. Based on the available experimental results, incorporating the different types of RA in concrete has the following effects on the mechanical properties (Brito & Saikia, 2012; Etxeberria et al., 2007; Juan & Gutiérrez, 2009; Kishore, 2007; KosiorKazberuk & Grzywa, 2014; Malešev et al., 2010; Rahal, 2007; Sryh & Forth, 2015; Xiao et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2008):

Decreased compressive strength approximately 20%.

Decreased splitting tensile strength approximately 15%.

Decreased flexural strength approximately 15%.

Decreased modulus of elasticity approximately 45%.

Increased water absorption approximately 50%.

Increased drying shrinkage approximately 50%.

Increased creep approximately 50%.
More recently, extensive experimental research has been carried out into the shortterm deflection and ultimate load capacity and behaviour of RAC (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz, 2007; American Concrete Institute, 2004; Arezoumandi et al., 2015; Ignjatović et al., 2013; Maruyama et al., 2004; Sato et al., 2007). Although different types of recycled aggregate were used in these studies, the same conclusion was drawn. The results showed that RAC beams had a slightly lower moment capacity, reduced stiffness after cracking and higher deflection and higher levels of damage at failure in comparison to NC beams. Moreover, wider and more closely spaced cracks were observed in RAC beams than NC beams. Moreover, the shear behaviour of reinforced concrete members containing recycled concrete aggregate has also been investigated. The findings from some experimental studies (Arezoumandi et al., 2014; Michaud et al., 2016; Wardeh & Ghorbel, 2019) provided evidence that up to 30% coarse recycled concrete aggregate and 10% granular recycled aggregate may be incorporated into structural concrete mixtures without affecting the shear performance. More than this replacement percentage will make the shear strength of recycled aggregate concrete are lower than natural aggregate concrete.
To date, little attention has been given to the timedependent behaviour of RAC beams under sustained loads. Lapko and Grygo (2010) tested beams made from NA and RCA under shortterm and longterm loading. The longterm loading results showed a further 20% greater deflection and a 46% greater strain in the compression zone in the beams made with RCA. Knaack and Kurama (2015) studied the timedependent sustained serviceload behaviour of beams with normal and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). Their findings revealed that an increase in the replacement ratio of recycled aggregate resulted in increased immediate and longterm deflections. They observed a similar increase in the number of cracks to that seen in the previous research mentioned above, which they attributed to the decrease in the modulus of rupture of RAC.
Using the ACI318 (American Concrete Institute, 2004) and BS EN 199211: Eurocode 2 (British Standards Institution, 2004) prediction methods, the obtained estimations for the immediate deflections for NC beams were reasonable, however, the codes estimations were less accurate when it used to predict the longterm deflections of the cracked RAC beams; ACI318 underestimated the deflections, whilst Eurocode 2 overestimated the deflections. In terms of the longterm deflections of the uncracked RAC beams, the obtained results were significantly underestimated by both ACI318 and Eurocode 2. In fact, these ‘uncracked’ beams were only uncracked initially, but cracked because of creep and shrinkage over time. Hence, treating these beams is very difficult using both codes if you do not take into account the change from State I to State II of the cracking behaviour.
On examination of the work presented by Knaack and Kurama, it appears that they have used the model of conventional concrete to predict the initial deflection without any modifications to include the effect of recycled aggregate. Due to this, it is difficult to make any assessment of the accuracy of the code prediction methods for longterm deflection. Knaack and Kurama, as well as Lapko and Grygo, did not attempt to explain the inaccuracies of the code prediction models or to provide any empirical modifications to the models to improve their accuracy.
Choi and Yun (2013) found the ratios between the longterm and immediate deflections for RAC beams made with coarse and fine CDW were smaller than the equivalent ratios for NC beams. They proposed a reduction factor, α (α = 0.92 and 0.86 for recycled coarse and fine aggregate concrete, respectively) for modifying the modulus of rupture when predicting the shortterm and longterm deflection of RAC beams using the ACI method. Modifying the tensile strength of the concrete is certainly an agreed way forward when calculating the crack spacing in a flexural element—the cracking theory proposed by Beeby (1990) clearly illustrates the relationship between tensile strength and crack spacing. It could also be argued that this approach is valid when considering the crack width calculation and the modification of this theory. However, in terms of deflection, rather than simply modifying the indirect tensile strength of the material, a more appropriate property to consider is the tension stiffening present in the section, as this not only represents the material, but also the composite interaction of the two elements (concrete and steel).
An attempt to represent the influence of this parameter on the deflection of NC is presented in Eurocode 2 (the β factor) and therefore allows easy modification when RAC beams are involved. In terms of crack width, Forth (Forth & Martin, 2014) highlighted the effect of tension stiffening (in the concrete between cracks) on the average strain in the steel in his comparison of the two formulae presented in Eurocode 2 (flexural) and Eurocode 2 Part 3 (axial); it is the average strain in the steel which is used to calculate the crack width in Eurocode 2. It therefore seems more reasonable that modifying the tension stiffening parameter is also a better approach to calculating crack width than simply modifying the tensile strength of the concrete.
Based on a review of the available literature (Choi & Yun, 2013; Knaack & Kurama, 2015; Łapko & Grygo, 2010), it is apparent that the guidance available in ACI318 and Eurocode 2 is only really accurate when predicting the ultimate loads of RAC beams. When it comes to predicting the deflection (short and longterm) and cracking behaviour of RAC beams the codes require some slight modifications. This investigation concentrates on determining the effect of RAC on the tension stiffening property (as this is deemed to be the most representative parameter when considering deflections and cracking) and modifies the theory presented in Eurocode 2 by introducing this influence via the β factor.
Experimental Programme
Materials
Portland high strength cement (C52.5 N) was used for all mixes of this research. The cement is manufactured to meet the requirements of BS EN 197–1. According to the standard limits of BS EN 882, natural river sand was used as a fine aggregate (FA) with a maximum particle size of 5 mm. Two types of coarse aggregate were used: a natural coarse aggregate (NA) composed of uncrushed limestone with a maximum particle size of 20 mm (NA), and a recycled aggregate (RA) composed of crushed, washed construction and demolition waste (CDW) also with a maximum size of 20 mm. The composition of the CDW as provided by the supplier is presented in Fig. 1.
The grading and properties of both types of aggregate conformed to the standard requirements of BS EN 882 and BS EN 8500 as shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1. In terms of the grading, the main concern in this research was to ensure that the grading of the two types of aggregate fell between the maximum and minimum grading lines defined in BS EN 882 (see Fig. 2). By doing so any effects on creep due to the differences in grading would be minimised. In addition, the longitudinal and shear reinforcement steel used in this research had a yield stress of 500 MPa and a modulus of elasticity of 200GPa.
Mix Proportions
Three different concrete mixes were designed and used for this research with three CDW replacement levels. The mixing water compensation method was followed in order to ensure all of the mixes had the same effective watertocement ratio (0.42). Additional water (AW) was added to the RAC mixes to compensate for the highwater absorption capacity of CDW (according to the final measured absorption ratio of CDW) and to achieve the required workability. The amount of additional water was calculated based on the amount of CDW in the mix and its water content. Details of the mix proportions and slump tests are summarised in Table 2.
Tension Stiffening Test
In the first stage of this research, six squaresection prisms (120 × 120x1200 mm) reinforced with a central bar ∅16 mm were prepared and cast for the longterm tension stiffening tests as shown in Fig. 3. There were two specimens of each mix. The first specimen was subjected to a sustained load for 35 days (The test was stopped when the stabilisation in the trend of results occurred.), and the second specimen was stored next to the first one and was used to measure shrinkage. A special rig was built for this test in the George Earl Laboratory at the University of Leeds which is similar to that used by Scott and Beeby in 2005 (2005).
In the first specimen, three strain gauges were placed at 300mm intervals along the length of the steel bar and were connected to a data logger to measure the strains in the bar over time. In addition, seven demountable mechanical strain gauges (DEMEC) were fixed on opposite sides of the concrete specimens every 150 mm in order to measure the surface strains of the concrete over time as shown in Fig. 4.
A direct tensile load of 45 kN was applied to the steel bar throughout the test using a hydraulic jack and load cell. The applied load corresponded to a stress of 200 MPa in the steel bar at the crack and matched the load applied during the beam test. The measured strains were used for calculating the reduction in tension stiffening of the concrete over time. Scott and Beeby’s Method 1 was followed for the tension stiffening calculations; the details of this method are presented in Scott and Beeby (2005). The calculations of concrete tensile stresses were based on the following relationship:
where \(\sigma_{c}\) is the concrete stress; \(F\) is the applied force; \({F}_{s}\) is the force in the reinforcing bar; and \({A}_{c}\) is the crosssectional area of the concrete section. Method 1 required the assumption of strain compatibility between the steel and surrounding concrete. Average reinforcement stresses were then calculated over the sample length by assuming that average reinforcement strains were the same as the average surface strains computed from the handheld mechanical strain gauge results. Calculation of average bar forces, and hence concrete stresses, was then straightforward. The final calculations were based on the loss of tensile stress in the concrete over time and the results were presented as a ratio between the measured longterm concrete stress and the initial stress which was measured directly after applying the load.
Beam Design and Test Procedures
In the second stage, fullscale beams were tested, long term, in flexure. All beams were prepared with the same longitudinal and shear reinforcement ratios using three different replacement levels of CDW (0%, 50% and 100%). All of the beams had a rectangular crosssection with a width of 300 mm and a height of 150 mm, and were 4.2 m in length, as shown in Fig. 5.
For the longterm tests, a stabilised cracking pattern was achieved in the simply supported beams by subjecting them to a sustained load of 23 KN (equivalent to a sustained moment of 17.2kNm (including the selfweight of the beam) and an average stress in the compression zone of around 7 MPa); the sustained load was maintained for a period of 90 days. The beam midspan deflection was measured using LVDT and recorded by a data logger. Surface strain measurements were also taken at four different heights on both sides of the beams. DEMEC points were placed every 150 mm along the constant moment zone. Electrical resistance strain (ERS) gauges were placed on the top surface at the midspan point of the three longitudinal reinforcing bars; these gauges were connected to a data logger and allowed automatic recording of the strains over the 90 days of the test. (The test was stopped when the stabilisation in the trend of results occurred.) The development of crack patterns and propagation were observed and marked on the beams; crack widths were measured using a handheld optical microscope.
For each mix, six cubes (100 × 100x100 mm), four cylinders (150 × 300 mm), three prisms (100 × 100x500 mm) and four small prisms (75 × 75x200 mm) were prepared and cast. These specimens were tested to measure the compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, creep and shrinkage of the resulting concrete. All of the beams and specimens were compacted immediately after casting and were left for 24 h before being removed from their moulds and transferred to the curing room for 28 days. Fig. 6 shows the test specimens and experimental setup.
Results and Discussion
Mechanical Properties
The measured mechanical properties of the concrete are summarised in Table 3. It is evident that due to the incorporation of CDW as RA, there was a reduction in all of the mechanical properties. In comparison with normal concrete, the results showed a reduction of 5 and 10% in the compressive strength, 15 and 30% in the splitting tensile strength, 10 and 22% in the flexural strength and 20 and 36% in the modulus of elasticity when 50 and 100%, respectively of the natural aggregate was replaced. As reported in the literature, these reductions are mainly attributed to the poor quality of the recycled aggregate. This poor quality is mainly due to the presence of old cement paste and other materials such as clay bricks and tiles (Brito & Saikia, 2012; Etxeberria et al., 2007; Juan & Gutiérrez, 2009; Kishore, 2007; KosiorKazberuk & Grzywa, 2014; Malešev et al., 2010; Rahal, 2007; Sryh & Forth, 2015; Xiao et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2008).
ShortTerm Deflection and Cracking Behaviour
Fig. 7 shows the relationship between the applied load and shortterm, midspan deflection of the beams. The measurements were taken up to an applied load of 23 KN (the value of the sustained load). The results indicate that the overall load–deflection behaviour of the RAC beam was similar to the behaviour of the conventional concrete beam (NC). The maximum midspan deflection increased by about 8 and 15% when 50 and 100% of CDW was added, respectively. For the two replacement levels (50 and 100%), the initial cracking loads measured for the beams containing recycled aggregate were about 15 and 30%, respectively less than that recorded in the normal concrete beams.
In terms of cracking, the RAC beams showed different cracking patterns to the NC beams. Wider and more closely spaced cracks were observed in the RAC specimens as detailed in Table 4 and Fig. 8. The results of this study were, therefore, similar to those reported earlier from previous investigations (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz, 2007; American Concrete Institute, 2004; Ignjatović et al., 2013; Maruyama et al., 2004; Sato et al., 2007). A reduced crack spacing and hence a greater number of cracks can clearly be linked to the lower tension stiffening and tensile strength of the RAC; as can the lower initial cracking loads which all can make the defection to be higher.
Creep and Shrinkage
Creep and shrinkage significantly affect the longterm deformations of concrete structures. As mentioned before, one of the main problems with using recycled aggregate is their low properties and high porosity, which is the result of the presence of old cement paste and other materials such as clay bricks and tiles. The old cement paste which adheres to the natural particles and the presence of bricks and tiles particles can decrease the volume of the aggregate in the mixture and increase the water content which leads to increased creep and shrinkage. In addition, the lower elastic properties of recycled aggregate can significantly influence the results of creep and shrinkage.
In this research, four small prism samples (75 × 75x200mm) were tested to assess the effect of RA on the compressive creep and shrinkage strains. Specimens were stored in a controlled environment at 20 °C and a relative humidity of 45%, similar to the average temperature and humidity in the laboratory where the beams were tested.
For the compressive creep test, the specimens were subjected to a constant compressive stress of 10 MPa (which is equivalent to 0.2ƒ^{`}_{c} of the control specimen). The compressive creep strains and coefficients were calculated based on the average results from the two specimens after removing the elastic strain and taking into account shrinkage. The creep and shrinkage data are presented in Fig. 9, the curves of the test results showed that the compressive creep coefficient and the shrinkage of the RAC increased by about 15 and 30%, and 18 and 38%, respectively, as a result of incorporating 50 and 100% recycled aggregate. These increases reflect the importance of understanding the longterm behaviour of RAC members.
LongTerm Loss of Tension Stiffening
Fig. 10 illustrates the effect of using CDW on the longterm loss of tension stiffening. The reduction over time of the ratio between the longterm concrete stress and the initial concrete stress was used to represent the loss of tension stiffening. The figure also shows the loss in the actual concrete tensile stress as a function of time for the NC and RAC specimens. As can be seen from the figure, there is a very rapid loss of tension stiffening in all of the specimens during the early stage of the test. Up until day 5, the normal concrete specimen and recycled aggregate concrete specimens exhibit similar reductions of around 25% from the initial applied stress. After day 5, the recycled aggregate specimens showed a higher rate of loss of tension stiffening in comparison to the normal concrete specimen.
The figure also shows that the stress in the normal concrete specimen stabilised earlier than that in the RAC specimens which only occurred at the 20th and 25th days for the 50 and 100% samples, respectively. After stabilisation occurred, the rate of loss of tension stiffening remained constant for all of the specimens. On the final day of testing (35th day), the tensile stress in the normal concrete had reduced by 36.2% while the stress in the RAC specimens had reduced by 42.4 and 49.1% for the 50 and 100% recycled aggregate specimens, respectively. This means that by substituting 50 and 100% of the aggregate, the loss of tension stiffening increased by 6.2 and 12.9%, respectively. Table 5 summarises the average short and longterm tensile stresses for the NC and RAC specimens.
In general, it can be concluded that the higher the replacement percentage of CDW, the greater the loss of tension stiffening. This can be attributed to the effect of the inclusion of the CDW as recycled aggregate on the mechanical properties of the concrete, in particular the tensile strength which is the most significant factor affecting tension stiffening. Furthermore, the effect of recycled aggregate on the microstructure of the Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) can influence the microcracking of the concrete matrix under load which can also cause the observed reduction in tension stiffening as discussed earlier in the section regarding the results of the mechanical properties.
LongTerm Flexural Behaviour
Fig. 11 shows a graph of the longterm midspan deflection versus time for all of the tested beams. In general, the specimens all showed a similar trend in deflection over the period of time, i.e. the deflection increased continuously. It is clear from the results that the increase in longterm deflection was much more rapid during the first 20 days of loading. The majority of the longterm deflection (about 65%) occurred during this time. Furthermore, the results indicate that increasing the replacement ratio of CDW resulted in significant increases in longterm deflection. The longterm deflection increased by 20 and 38% as a result of replacing 50 and 100% of the aggregate, respectively. This was attributed to the effect of recycled aggregate on the properties of the concrete, in particular the timedependent deformation (e.g. creep and shrinkage).
In terms of crack development, the cracks in the RAC beams extended further throughout the height of the section than those in the NC beams as shown in Fig. 8. Also, the cracks were wider in the RAC beams under sustained load, as summarised in Table 4, which agrees with the observations of Choi and Yun (Choi & Yun, 2013). It can be noticed from the results that the percentage of the increase in the crack width decreased by increasing the replacement ratio. This can be owed to the increased number of cracks with increasing the replacement ratio of CDW which reduced the spaces between the cracks and hence distributed the development of width on more cracks.
Analytical Investigation
Based on the CEBFIB Model Code, the BS EN 199211: Eurocode 2 (EC2) approach was proposed to estimate the deformations (curvature, strain, deflection, etc.) of beams subjected to bending (British Standards Institution, 2004). Expression 7.18 of Eurocode 2 is used to determine the deformation parameter, α, as shown below:
where α_{I} and α_{II} are the values of the deformation parameters calculated for the uncracked and fully cracked stages, respectively, and ξ is the distribution coefficient that is used to model the effects of the tension stiffening of the section. ξ is calculated from Expression 7.19 of Eurocode 2 as follows:
where β is a coefficient which takes into account the influence of the duration and type of loading (β = 1 for shortterm loading and 0.5 for longterm or repeated loading). M_{cr} is the first cracking moment and M_{a} is the applied moment.
Eurocode 2 is used to predict the longterm curvature of a beam in bending and includes the effect of creep and shrinkage separately. The effect of creep is included by modifying the modulus of elasticity of the concrete through the Effective Modulus Method (EMM) based on the creep coefficient as shown below:
whereas the curvature due to the shrinkage effect is calculated using:
where ε_{sh} is the shrinkage strain, α_{e} is the modular ratio, S_{c} and S_{u} are the first moments of area of the reinforcement about the centroid of the cracked and uncracked sections and I_{c} and I_{u} are the second moments of area of the cracked and uncracked sections.
The total longterm curvature is calculated using the expression:
and the total longterm deflection is:
where K is the deflection coefficient factor which depends on the loading case and bending moment diagram and L is the span of the member.
By following the equations of Eurocode 2 and using the experimental results for the concrete strength properties, creep and shrinkage, the predictions for the 90day (total longterm deflections) were calculated and are summarised in Table 6. The code predictions showed good agreement with the experimental results for the normal concrete beams. However, it can be seen that when the replacement ratio of recycled aggregate increased, the predictions using the Eurocode 2 method are less accurate and underestimate the shortterm and longterm experimental values. (Note: due to the loading system applied to the beams of this investigation and the subsequent size of the constant moment zone and the fact that a stabilised crack pattern was produced within the constant moment zone a constant distribution coefficient, based on the maximum moment in the span, was utilised within the code method for predicting curvature/deflection. Potentially, this could have been conservative, overpredicting the deflection. However, as can be seen from Fig. 12 (NC), this approach did appear to be appropriate).
This underestimation by the code is due to the tension stiffening behaviour of the RAC beam as compared to the NC beam (as discussed in Sect. 4.4) which is not taken into account in the code method for prediction the deflection. At 90 days, the code predictions are still within 10% of the measured values, however, by comparing the trends of the measured and predicted curves, the error at ultimate will be greater and exceed the normally acceptable ± 20% error for these type of predictions (Narayanan and Beeby) (Narayanan & Beeby, 2005).
More specifically, the Eurocode 2 approach incorporates the effect of the loss of tension stiffening using a fixed value for the factor β (β = 1 for shortterm loading and 0.5 for longterm or repeated loading) which does not vary for different types of concrete. Therefore, based on the experimental results of the longterm tension stiffening tests and the recommendations of Whittle and Jonse (Whittle & Jones, 2004) and Scott and Beeby (Scott & Beeby, 2012) in order to account for the effect of tension stiffening on the flexural behaviour, modifications are proposed to the Eurocode 2 method to address the effect of the addition of RA. The results indicate that with an increase in the level of RA, the value of β should reduce to below 0.5 for calculating longterm deflections. According to these results, β values of 0.4 and 0.3 are proposed for concrete with 50 and 100% of RA replacement, respectively. These values were obtained from a backcalculation of the longterm experimental deflections.
Another statistical method for extrapolating this type of hyperbolic results which was suggested by Ross (Ross, 1937) and recommended by Neville et al. (1983), was also used as shown below:
where \(\Delta \left( {t,t_{0} } \right)\) = the deflection at anytime; (\(t  t_{0} )\) = time under loading (days); and \({\text{A}}\) and \({\text{B}}\) = constants.
When \(\left( {t  t_{0} } \right)\) reaches infinity, the ultimate deflection will be \(1/{\text{B}}\). Hence, the limiting deflection can be found from the experimental results that have been obtained by plotting the relationship between [\(\left( {t  t_{0} } \right)/\Delta \left( {t,t_{0} } \right)\)] and \(\left( {t  t_{0} } \right)\) for each case. The slope of this linear relationship represents the constant \({\text{B}}\), and the intercept of the ordinate is the constant \({\text{A}}\). Fig. 13 shows the hyperbolic relations proposed by Ross (1937) for extrapolating the results of (RAC100).
Using only the 90day data to produce the revised values of beta was assessed by extrapolating the data beyond 90 days for 25 years using the Ross hyberbola and calculating the ultimate deflection (longterm tests are normally performed for at least 6 months or to a point when the curve has flattened out a lot more). The error between the extrapolated longterm deflections (experimental and code predictions) after 25 years of loading did not exceed 5%, hence confirming our use of the 90day beam data.
The application of these proposed values of beta from the longterm deflection calculations gave more accurate predictions when the experimental results of the shortterm deflections were used as shown in Fig. 12. The proposed calculation method was validated using results from previous experimental investigations presented in the literature. The results from this research and from the data of Lapko and Grygo (2010) and Knaack and Kurama (2015) are presented in Table 7. The comparison between the experimental and predicted results confirms that the modification provides more accurate results.
Conclusions
In this research, the effect of recycled aggregate on the longterm flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams was investigated. The following conclusions can be drawn from this investigation:

In terms of ultimate and serviceability limit state performance, this investigation further confirms the potential for the use of recycled aggregate in structural concrete mixes. However, further research is required to assess the durability of RAC and its interaction with structural performance.

Modifying the tension stiffening parameter present in the Eurocode 2 method for predicting deflection appears to be a suitable approach to accommodating the effect of recycled aggregate on the longterm performance of RAC. (The approach needs to be further extended to assess its suitability with respect to modifying the Code approach to predicting crack spacing and width.)

There was a noticeable increase in the longterm deflection of the RAC beams which reflects the effect of recycled aggregate on the creep and shrinkage, as well as on the longterm loss of tension stiffening; all of which are the main parameters that constitute longterm deflection.

Recycled aggregate reduces the mechanical properties of concrete and also the first cracking moment of RAC beams. Increasing the proportion of recycled aggregate results in higher shortterm deflections and wider and closer cracks.

The accuracy of the Eurocode 2 predictions for longterm deflections of reinforced concrete beams observed in this investigation and the ease with which it can be modified, confirm the appropriateness of this method for design purposes.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. Any more datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ajdukiewicz, A. B., & Kliszczewicz, A. T. (2007). Comparative tests of beams and columns made of recycled aggregate concrete and natural aggregate concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 5(2), 259–273.
American Concrete Institute. (2004). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–05) and commentary (ACI 318R–05). American Concrete Institute.
Arezoumandi, M., Smith, A., Volz, J. S., & Khayat, K. H. (2014). An experimental study on shear strength of reinforced concrete beams with 100% recycled concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 53, 612–620.
Arezoumandi, M., Smith, A., Volz, J. S., & Khayat, K. H. (2015). An experimental study on flexural strength of reinforced concrete beams with 100% recycled concrete aggregate. Engineering Structures, 88, 154–162.
Beeby, A.W. (1990). Fixings in cracked concrete. The probability of coincident occurrence and likely crack width. CIRIA Technical Note 136.
British Standards Institution. (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures: Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. British Standards Institution.
De Brito, J., & Saikia, N. (2012). Recycled aggregate in concrete: use of industrial, construction and demolition waste. Science & Business Media.
Choi, W. C., & Yun, H. D. (2013). Longterm deflection and flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams with recycled aggregate. Materials & Design, 51, 742–750.
Etxeberria, M., Mari, A. R., & Vazquez, E. (2007). Recycled aggregate concrete as structural material. Materials and Structures, 40(5), 529–541.
Forth, J. P., & Martin, A. J. (2014). Design of liquid retaining concrete structures (3rd ed.). Whittles Publishing.
Ignjatović, I. S., Marinković, S. B., Mišković, Z. M., & Savić, A. R. (2013). Flexural behavior of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams under shortterm loading. Materials and Structures, 46(6), 1045–1059.
De Juan, M. S., & Gutiérrez, P. A. (2009). Study on the influence of attached mortar content on the properties of recycled concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 23(2), 872–877.
Kishore, R. (2007, June). Influence of recycled aggregate on flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams. In: International conference on sustainable construction materials and technology (pp. 11–13).
Knaack, A. M., & Kurama, Y. C. (2015). Sustained service load behavior of concrete beams with recycled concrete aggregates. ACI Structural Journal, 112(5), 565.
KosiorKazberuk, M., & Grzywa, M. (2014). Recycled aggregate concrete as material for reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 7(2), 60–66.
Łapko, A., & Grygo, R. (2010, May). Long term deformations of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) beams made of recycled concrete. In: Modern buildings materials structures and techniques, proceedings of the 10th international conference.
Malešev, M., Radonjanin, V., & Marinković, S. (2010). Recycled concrete as aggregate for structural concrete production. Sustainability, 2(5), 1204–1225.
Maruyama, I., Sogo, M., Sogabe, T., Sato, R. and Kawai, K., 2004, November. Flexural properties of reinforced recycled concrete beams. In: Proceedings of the international RILEM conference on the use of recycled materials in buildings and structures, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 8–11).
Michaud, K., Hoult, N., Lotfy, A., & Lum, P. (2016). Performance in shear of reinforced concrete slabs containing recycled concrete aggregate. Materials and Structures, 49(10), 4425–4438.
Narayanan, R. S., & Beeby, A. W. (2005). Designers' Guide to EN 199211 and EN 199212. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures: General rules and rules for buildings and structural fire design (Vol. 17). Thomas Telford.
Neville, A. M., Dilger, W. H., & Brooks, J. J. (1983). Creep of plain and structural concrete. Construction press.
Rahal, K. (2007). Mechanical properties of concrete with recycled coarse aggregate. Building and Environment, 42(1), 407–415.
Ross, A. (1937). Concrete creep data. Structural Engineer, 15, 314–326.
Sato, R., Maruyama, I., Sogabe, T., & Sogo, M. (2007). Flexural behavior of reinforced recycled concrete beams. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 5(1), 43–61.
Scott, R. H., & Beeby, A. W. (2005). Longterm tensionstiffening effects in concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 102(1), 31.
Scott, R. H., & Beeby, A. W. (2012). Evaluation and management of tension stiffening. Special Publication, 284, 1–18.
Sryh, L. and Forth, J., 2015. Experimental investigation on the effect of steel fibres on the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete. In: Proceedings of the international conference on the fibre concrete, Prague, Czech Republic.
Wardeh, G., & Ghorbel, E. (2019). Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams with recycled aggregates. Advances in Structural Engineering, 22(8), 1938–1951.
Whittle, R., & Jones, T. (2004). Technical Report No. 59: Influence of tension stiffening on deflection of reinforced concrete structures. The Concrete Society, Camberley.
Xiao, J., Li, J., & Zhang, C. (2005). Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(6), 1187–1194.
Yang, K.H., Chung, H.S., & Ashour, A.F. (2008). Influence of type and replacement level of recycled aggregates on concrete properties.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the sponsors of this research: The Libyan Embassy in the UK and the School of Civil Engineering at the University of Leeds.
Funding
The authors declare that they have not received any fund for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LS and JF conceived of the presented idea. LS and JF designed and planned the experiments. LS carried out the experimental programme. JF encouraged LS to investigate the longterm loss of tension stiffening and supervised the findings of this work. LS performed the analytical investigation and performed the numerical calculations. Both LS and JF authors discussed the results and proposed the computational adjustment. LS took the lead in writing the manuscript and JF provided critical feedback and helped shape the final manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors' information
Dr. Lamen Sryh, BSc. and MSc. of Civil Engineering, Elmergib University, Libya. PhD of Concrete Structures, University of Leeds, UK. Assistant Professor at the Department of Civil Engineering, Elmergib University, Libya. The manager of Postgraduate Office at the Engineering Faculty, Elmergib University, Libya.
Prof. John Forth, BEng (Hons) Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield. PhD Structural masonry/reinforced concrete—School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds. Postgraduate certificate in learning and teaching in higher education, University of Leeds. Professor of Concrete Engineering & Structures at School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, United Kingdom. Director of the Neville Centre of Excellence.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sryh, L., Forth, J. LongTerm Flexural Behaviour of Cracked Reinforced Concrete Beams with Recycled Aggregate. Int J Concr Struct Mater 16, 19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069022005120
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069022005120
Keywords
 reinforced concrete beams
 recycled aggregate concrete
 flexural behaviour
 longterm deflection
 creep and shrinkage
 tension stiffening