Skip to main content

Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Reinforced with Various Steel Fibers


The objective of the present study is to examine the effects of different types and content of steel fibers on the workability, mechanical properties, and ductility enhancement of lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC). Thirteen LWAC mixtures were prepared using different types of steel fibers including conventional hooked-end macro steel fibers (SF(H)), straight (CSF(S)), crimp-shaped (CSF(C)), and hooked-end (CSF(H)) copper-coated micro steel fibers at the designed compressive strength of 40 MPa. The fiber volume fraction varied from 0% to 1.5% at an interval of 0.5%. Test results showed that CSF(H) type possesses a better potential than the other types in enhancing the tensile resistance and toughness at the post-peak branch of the load–deflection curve of beams. The bond characteristics of fibers with cement matrix were one of critical parameters that needs to be considered in designing the fiber reinforced concrete. Thus, the splitting strength, modulus of rupture, and modulus of elasticity of fiber reinforced LWAC were formulated as a function of volume fraction, aspect ratio, and bond strength of fibers from the regression analysis using the present test data.


With the development of large and tall concrete structures, concrete is required to have better performance (e.g., workability, higher strength and toughness, and light weight) (Mays & Barnes, 1991). Lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC) is superior to normal weight concrete (NWC) in terms of fire resistance, seismic resistance, and thermal insulation (Li et al., 2017). LWAC has a higher strength-to-weight ratio than NWC (ACI Balendran et al., 2002; Committee&213, 2014). Hence, relatively smaller cross-sectional area and lighter structural elements can be designed using LWAC. It is necessary to set the target strength high to offset the low stiffness of LWAC designed for structural purposes. However, an increase in concrete strength can result in high brittleness (Li et al., 2021). The addition of fibers to concrete can mitigate these negative effects and improve the mechanical performance of LWAC (Hamoush et al., 2010). The most important properties of fibers that affect the strength and ductility of LWAC are the volume fraction (Vf), aspect ratio (Sf), tensile strength (Ff), and bond stress (τ) between the cement matrix and fiber interface. Steel fibers are commonly used to improve the mechanical properties of LWAC (Turk et al., 2021). However, if Vf of steel fibers is 2% or more, LWAC density may increase. Furthermore, corrosion of steel fibers may decrease the long-term durability of concrete. Alternatively, copper-coated micro steel fibers having a diameter (df) of approximately 0.2 mm can be used (Okeh et al., 2019). In general, fibers with smaller df and larger Sf can secure the ductility of concrete even with a relatively low Vf. Moreover, surface coating can help in long-term corrosion resistance.

Kang et. al. (2010) reported that the tensile strength of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete increases linearly when the Vf of the steel fibers is increased up to 5%. Dupont and Vandewalle (2005) pointed out that when Vf exceeded 2%, the interaction between fibers increased. This could induce a balling effect during the mixing or placing process of concrete. Park et. al. (2012) and Kim et. al. (2011) showed that deformed macro steel fibers (twisted, crimped, and hooked-end shapes) could significantly improve the tensile and flexural performance of concrete compared to non-deformed steel fibers (e.g., straight shape). The deformed shape can increase the fiber pullout resistance in the cement matrix, and it could be directly related to the improvement of the bridging effect of the fibers (Wu et al., 2018). Visalvanich and Naaman (1983) indicated that there was a concern that the deformed shapes of steel fibers could act as a link to weave other fibers during the mixing process. This could inhibit the distribution of fibers. As a result, the geometry of the steel fiber can lead to contradictory results in assessing the workability, tensile capacity and mechanical properties of concrete. Hence, shape of fiber should be considered as a critical parameter along with Vf in assessing the mechanical properties of concrete. Additional studies on fiber reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete (FRLWAC) are needed because of the variability in the characteristics of lightweight aggregates (LWAs). In LWAC, cracks and fractures first occur in the aggregates unlike NWC, where the performance of the concrete is mainly determined by the paste, because the aggregate is generally stronger than the paste (Sim et al., 2013). Lee et. al. (2019) reported that the low strength of the lightweight aggregates yields more rapid crack propagation and more brittle fracture of concrete, because the cracks mainly pass through the aggregate particles, resulting in localized failure zones. Therefore, a large amount of data on the mechanical properties of FRLWAC is needed to establish a design model for making detailed decisions (e.g., fiber type, Vf and LWA type, density, and water absorption) to achieve the target performance of FRLWAC.

In this study, we evaluated the effects of various properties of different fibers on the mechanical properties of FRLWAC. Four steel fiber types with different geometrical shapes, Lf, and df were used in this study. Twelve FRLWAC mixtures were prepared for different Vf. A fiberless mixture was used as a control group. The compressive strength (fc(t)), splitting tensile strength (fsp), load–deflection relationship, modulus of rupture (fr) of concrete, and bond stress–slip relationship of embedded individual fibers were evaluated in this study. In addition, equations were developed based on experimental data and regression analysis to comprehensively evaluate the various mechanical properties of FRLWAC.

Experimental Details

Materials and Mix Proportion

The ordinary Portland cement used in this study had a density of 3.15 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 3260 cm2/g with other properties meeting the specifications of ASTM type I (2012) (ASTM C150/C150M, 2011). Commercially available artificially expanded granules manufactured by Korea South–East Power Co. were used as structural LWAs. The bottom ash and dredged soil used for the raw materials of the granules were calcined and allowed to expand in large rotary kilns at approximately 1200 °C. The main components of the LWA, confirmed by X-ray diffraction, were quartz and magnetite (Fig. 1). The expanded granules were produced in nominal sizes (e.g., below 2 mm, 2–5 mm, 5–10 mm, and 10–20 mm), and adjusted to satisfy the particle distribution curve specified in ASTM C 330 (ASTM C330/C330M, 2017). The physical characteristics of the LWAs used are summarized in Table 1. In this study, four types of steel fibers with different shapes, surface coating conditions, Lf, df, and τ were used. In addition, different copper-coated fibers (i.e., straight (CSF(S)), crimped (CSF(C)), and end-hooked (CSF(H)) in addition to conventional end-hooked steel fibers (SF(H)) were utilized (Fig. 2). The manufacturer (SM KOREA Co., Anyang-si, Korea) reported that the tensile strengths of SF and CSF were 2240 and 1220 MPa, respectively. Additional fiber properties are shown in Table 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

X-ray diffraction patterns of artificial lightweight aggregates.

Table 1 Physical properties of aggregates.
Fig. 2
figure 2

Typical appearances of steel fibers: a SF(H); b CSF(S); c CSF(C); d CSF(H).

Table 2 Properties of steel fibers.

Table 3 shows the mix proportion of LWAC used in the experiment. The water-to-cement ratio (W/C) was set to be 0.35, and the fine aggregate-to-total aggregate ratio (S/A) was set to be 0.45. Twelve FRLWAC mixtures and a counterpart control fiberless mixture were initially prepared considering the steel fiber types and their Vf. There were three levels of Vf (0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%) for each fiber type. Thus, the FRLWAC specimens were denoted using the steel fiber type and Vf level. For example, CSF(C)-1.0 indicates an LWAC mixture reinforced using crimped steel fiber with Vf = 1.0%. Specimen Co refers to the control fiberless mixture.

Table 3 Mix proportion of concrete.


Steel fibers were added after wet mixing of the LWAC. To achieve the targeted minimum slump, a different contents of commercially available polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer was added to each mixture. The slump and air content tests of fresh concrete were conducted according to ASTM C143 and C231, respectively. All specimens were subjected to the vibration casting method specified in ASTM C31. The specimens were cured at a steady temperature and relative humidity of 23 ± 2 °C and 60 ± 5%, respectively, until they were tested at the specified age. The compressive strength, dry densities, splitting tensile strength, and elastic modulus of concrete were measured using 100 × 200 mm cylindrical specimens, as specified in ASTM C39, C138, C496, and C469, respectively. The relationship between the modulus of rupture and load deflection was measured using prismatic beams having dimensions of 100 × 100 × 400 mm under four-point bending according to ASTM C78 and C1018, respectively.

Fig. 3 shows the fiber pullout test setup used to evaluate the bond stress for each steel fiber type. A load cell with a maximum capacity of 3 kN was used to measure the applied pullout load in the jigs. A dog-bone specimen embedded with one individual fiber was fixed between two jigs, and the pullout test was performed at a speed of 0.02 mm/s (Kim & Yoo, 2020). The pullout of each fiber was commonly induced to occur at the side of the specimen with a 10 mm fiber embedment length. The applied load–slip relationship was evaluated by assuming that the stroke displacement was the slip of the fiber. The average bond stress of the fiber (τ) was calculated by dividing the maximum pullout load by the initial bonding area between the fiber and matrix (Eq. 1):

$$\tau = P_{\max } /\pi d_{f} L_{E} ,$$
Fig. 3
figure 3

Fiber pullout test setup.

where Pmax is the maximum pullout load, and LE is the initial embedded length of the fiber. The mean of the three specimens was applied to all the test results. The compressive strength was measured at 3, 28, and 91 days, and all other tests were performed at 28 days.

Results and Discussion

FiberMatrix Bond Stress

The increase in the mechanical performance of concrete owing to fiber reinforcement is strongly related to the fiber–matrix interaction and bond strength. Kim and Yoo (2020) reported that the pullout load of the fiber increased significantly when the mechanical anchorage effect was induced owing to the geometric deformation of the steel fiber.

Fig. 4 shows the bond stress–slip relationship for each steel fiber type. Although the Lf of CSF(C) and CSF(S) was 13 mm (Table 2), steel fibers with Lf of 20 mm or more were used in this test to fix the LE to 10 mm. The bond stress–slip curve was substantially different depending on the type of steel fiber (Fig. 4). Particularly, crimped and hooked-end shapes showed relatively high τ values owing to their additional mechanical anchorage effects. In contrast, the straight shape was chemically attached to the adjacent cement matrix. This can also be confirmed by the very steep slope of the descending section, i.e., after the peak in the relationship curve of SCF(S). The test results showed that CSF(H) and SF(H) had excellent pullout resistance with maximum τ values of 18.68 and 16.2 MPa, respectively, followed by SCF(C) (11.2 MPa) and SCF(S) (8.6 MPa) (Table 2). Moreover, the results indicated that if other engineering characteristics were excluded and only the influence on the bridging effect between matrices was considered, transforming it into a hooked-end shape can be advantageous. Kim and Yoo (2020) also reported that τ increased in the order of hooked-end, twist, and straight shape, and the averages were 18.6, 17.3, and 10.9, respectively, which was similar to the results seen.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Bond stress–slip relationship of fibers.


In the case of LWAC, a lighter mixture may induce a lower slump (Sl) owing to the effect of gravity between slump tests (Kockal & Ozturan, 2011). Mehta and Monteiro (2017) reported that an SI of approximately 50–75 mm could be sufficient to ensure good workability of LWAC. The test results of the FRLWAC workability showed that the addition of steel fibers tended to lower Sl (Table 4 and Fig. 5). A number of studies, including Bilodeau et. al. (2004); Olivito and Zuccarello (2010), point to the same point of view. Thus, LWAC reinforced with a higher Vf required a higher quantity of superplasticizer to achieve the minimum Sl target value. When Vf was increased from 0.5% to 1.5%, the ratio of superplasticizer content (Rsp) of SF(H), CSF(C), and SCF(H) mixtures increased by 0.15%, 0.4%, and 0.35%, respectively. However, the measured Sl values tended to decrease. On the other hand, for the CSF(S) mixture, when Vf increased from 0.5% to 1.5%, Rsp increased by 1.5%, while Sl decreased by 30 mm. The result indicated that the deformed steel fibers were more unfavorable than the straight-shaped in maintaining the workability of LWAC, because the geometric shape deformation of fibers could accelerate the fiber balling effect owing to the geometry of fibers.

Table 4 Details of test specimens and summary of test results.
Fig. 5
figure 5

Regression analysis for slump value of fresh concrete.

The slump value of fresh concrete can be determined mainly by Vf and Rsp (Fig. 5). The regression analysis results showed that the slump value was inversely proportional to Vf and directly proportional to Rsp. Therefore, it is possible to predict workability using parameters, such as Vf and Rsp, in mixtures, where the same fibers are utilized. In securing the workability of FRLWAC, SF(H) and SCF(S) seem to be relatively effective. This might be attributed to the fact that SF(H), with a greater df and longer Lf, produces fewer individual fibers, which can degrade the slump of concrete compared to fibers with a smaller diameter.

Compressive Strength and Oven-Dry Density

Fig. 6 shows the compressive strength and oven-dry density of FRLWAC based on the steel fiber type and Vf. Steel fibers generally increase the compressive strength of LWAC, but the increase is not large. First, the Co mixture showed a compressive strength of 43.4 MPa at an oven-dry density of 1685 kg/m3 at 28 days. The compressive strength of FRLWAC generally increases as Vf increases. For Vf = 1.5% specimens, the compressive strength of SF(H), CSF(S), CSF(C), and CSF(H) increased by approximately 23.1%, 39.8%, 11.3%, and 15.8%, respectively, compared to the Co mixture. In CSF(S) and SF(H) groups, the addition of fibers had a relatively positive impact on strength improvement, which was closely related to the dispersibility of the fibers. Huang and Zhao (1995) indicated that fiber distribution is very difficult in FRLWAC with a high Vf value. This could result in incomplete compaction and decreased compressive strength. The results of this study showed that CSF(C) and CSF(H), which have a higher quantity of deformed individual fibers, exhibited relatively low strength, i.e., the strength of Vf = 1.5% specimens was lower than that of Vf = 1.0%. The relative oven-dry density (ρc) of FRLWAC increased linearly with the Vf value, and this increasing rate was independent of the steel fiber type.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Compressive strength and oven-dry density of concrete.

All the ALWC mixtures exhibited a parabolic curve of the compressive strength development. The ratios of 3-day compressive strength relative to 28-day strength ranged between 0.69 and 0.78, 0.68 and 0.76, 0.7 and 0.82, and 0.72 and 0.85 for SF(H), CSF(S), CSF(C), and CSF(H) groups, respectively. The corresponding rages obtained at 91 days are between 1.03 and 1.14, 1.06 and 1.14, 1.01 and 1.08, and 1.02 and 1.12, respectively, for such groups. Hence, the compressive strength development of LWAC was marginally affected by the type, shape, and volume fraction of steel fibers.

Splitting Tensile Strength

According to ASTM C 330, structural LWACs must have a splitting tensile strength (fsp) of at least 2.0 MPa. The fsp of LWAC was significantly lower than that of NWC with the same compressive strength, because initial cracks can be induced inside the aggregates rather than in the ITZ between the aggregates and matrix (Sim et al., 2013). When Vf was 0.5%, the fsp of CSF(C) and CSF(H) were relatively higher than that of the others (Fig. 7). When Vf increases by 1.0% or more, fsp increases linearly. However, the increase in CSF(S) was relatively higher. Hassanpour et. al. (2012) reported that the fsp of FRLWAC was 16–61% higher than that of fiberless LWAC. fsp/(fsp)N, representing the relative fsp value of FRLWAC compared to that of the fiberless specimen, was in the range of 1.13–1.92, where the subscript N refers to the fiberless control concrete. The fsp/(fsp)N value ranged from 1.14 to 1.44, 1.13 to 1.92, 1.29 to 1.82, and 1.36 to 1.82 for the SF(H), CSF(S), CSF(C), and CSF(H) groups, respectively (Table 4 and Fig. 8).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Splitting tensile strength according to volume fraction of fibers.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Regression analysis for normalized splitting tensile strength of concrete.

Visalvanich and Naaman (1983) defined the characteristics of fibers influencing the performance of FRLWAC as the fiber-reinforced index (β) and expressed it as β = gτVf Lf/df, where g, τ, and Lf/df refer to the efficiency factor of discontinuous fibers, interfacial fiber bond strength, and fiber aspect ratio (Sf), respectively. It is difficult to evaluate the factor g independently as g is dependent on several parameters, such as fiber orientation and/or dispersibility, mean embedded length after matrix cracking, and contact area between the fiber and cement matrix. We devised a modified formula for β using Sf, Vf, and τ that measured in Sect. 4.1 for each fiber type.

Fig. 8 shows the results of nonlinear multiple regression (NLMR) of fsp/(fsp)N using modified Sf, Vf, and τ as parameters. The exponent for each variable shown on the X-axis represents the weight of the parameter. The Vf and Sf weights were greater than that of τ for the tensile properties of FRLWAC. The Sf weight was particularly high, because Lf and df of steel fibers compared in this study were significantly different. For example, even if Vf was similar, the individual quantity (Qf) of SCF(S) (df = 0.2 mm, Lf = 13 mm) was 24.2 times higher than that of SF(H) (df = 0.6 mm, Lf = 35 mm), whereas that of SCF(H) (df = 0.3 mm, Lf = 30 mm) was 4.7 times higher. (Note: The Qf of fibers for Vf = 1% (Qf = 10,000,000/π(df/2) Lf) were 101,051 for SF(H), 2,448,538 for CSF(S), CSF(C), and 471,570 for CSF(H)). Therefore, it is necessary to treat Sf, which affects the number of individual fibers, as a variable as important as Vf in determining the mechanical properties of FRLWAC. From NLMR analysis using test data sets (Fig. 8), the fsp value for FRLWAC can be optimized as follows:

$$f_{sp} = 1.45\left( {V_{f}^{1.2} \cdot S_{f}^{1.7} \cdot \tau^{0.6} } \right)^{0.26} \cdot (f_{sp} )_{N} .$$

Flexural Performance

Fig. 9 shows the typical load–deflection behavior of LWAC reinforced with different fiber types at different Vf. There were no data of the control fiberless LWAC after the peak load, because it failed after the initial flexural crack appeared. The descending section of FRLWAC load–deflection curve in Fig. 9 shows the effect of each fiber on the tensile and ductility properties. Many researchers, including Meng and Khayat (2017) and Gesoglu et. al. (2016), have reported that the slope of the descending branch decreases as the bridging capacity or Vf of the fiber increases. The beam with Vf = 0.5% showed a similar performance, because the effects of the fibers were small. On the other hand, when Vf was 1.0 or 1.5%, the behavior of the descending section was significantly different depending on the fiber type. The CSF(H)-1.5 beam showed slight hardening or plastic flow performance after initial cracking, but the CSF(S)-1.5 beam showed a very short hardening stage. The CSF(H) group and Vf = 1.5% group revealed that the ultimate load (Pn) was higher than the initial cracking load (Pcr) by 4.2–18.1%, and the hardening performance was observed after Pcr. This results indicated that hooked-end shape fibers were most efficient in enhancing the ductility of FRLWAC.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Typical load–deflection curve of beams under four-point bending test: a SF(H); b CSF(S); c CSF(C); d CSF(H).

Fig. 10 shows typical images of the interaction between the cement matrix and steel fibers across a flexural crack, captured for Beams CSF(H)-1.0, SF(H)-1.0, and CSF(S)-1.0. All the beams failed along the primary crack developed at the mid-span, indicating no crack distribution. Most straight shaped fibers were pulled out from the cement matrix, resulting in a wider crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) in the CSF(S) group, when compared to the other groups using fibers with a longer length. Hooked-end fibers across the crack effectively restricted crack propagation even at the post-peak response because of their good sliding resistance with cement matrix.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Typical images of crack pattern after four-point bending test: a CSF(H)-1.0; b SF(H)-1.0; c CSF(S)-1.0.

Flexural Strength

Fig. 11 and Table 3 show the flexural strength (fr) of FRLWAC and fiberless control concrete evaluated via the four-point bending test. As expected, regardless of the steel fiber type, fr values increased with increasing Vf in all FRLWACs. Previous research by (Balendran et. al. (2002); Campione et. al. (2001); Domagala (2011)) have shown that by adding steel fiber to LWAC, the flexural strength of LWAC increased by about 6–38% for Vf ≤ 0.5%, 14–182% for 0.5% < Vf ≤ 1% and 42–120% for 1% < Vf ≤ 2%. The normalized fr (fr/(fr)N) values ranged from 1.35 to 2.04, 1.26 to 1.83, 1.38 to 1.63, and 1.54 to 2.31 for the SF(H), CSF(S), CSF(C), and CSF(H) groups, respectively. The fr values of the SF(H)-1.5 and CSF(H)-1.5 specimens were relatively high, whereas that of the CSF(C)-1.5 specimen showed the lowest value. This trend is somewhat contrasted with the splitting tensile performance of FRLWAC.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Modulus of rupture according to the volume fraction of fibers.

When evaluating the flexural performance of FRLWAC, the elastic section before reaching Pcr is significantly affected by the strength of the concrete and τ of the reinforcing fibers. However, it is reasonable to assume that most of the τ between the fibers and matrix, which plays a bridging role in the fracture plane, is already lost after initial cracking. The geometric shape of the steel fiber is considered to have a significant influence on determining the ductility capacity and Pn of FRLWAC after reaching Pcr. The crack opening displacement of a specimen containing deformed fibers may increase more than that containing a non-deformed fiber owing to the straightening of the deformed shape. The fr of the CSF(C)-1.5 beam is believed to be relatively low because of this mechanism.

Fig. 12 shows the NLMR analysis results of the flexural strength (fr/(fr)N) of FRLWAC, which was normalized based on the results of the fiberless control concrete. Similar to the previous analysis of fsp/(fsp)N, the increasing rate of flexural strength of FRLWAC was predicted using the modified formula for β. The weights of Vf, Sf, and τ, set as parameters of prediction, were 0.6, 0.4, and 0.5, respectively. The fr values for FRLWAC can be optimized via NLMR analysis as follows:

$$f_{r} = 1.53\left( {V_{f}^{0.6} \cdot S_{f}^{0.4} \cdot \tau^{0.5} } \right)^{0.53} \cdot (f_{r} )_{N} .$$
Fig. 12
figure 12

Regression analysis for normalized modulus of rupture of concrete.

Modulus of Elasticity

Owing to the low modulus of elasticity (Ec) of the aggregate, Ec of LWAC was 25–50% lower than that of NWC with the same compressive strength. This tendency became more prominent as the LWA content increased. Mehta and Monteiro (2017) suggested that fiber reinforcement in LWAC is not an appropriate solution for improving Ec, especially when Vf is low. Some studies (Campione et. al. (2001); Shafigh et. al. (2011)) reported that Ec could be increased by 6–30% when Vf of FRLWAC was increased.

Fig. 13 shows the NLMR analysis results for the normalized modulus of elasticity (Ec/√fc(28)), where fc(28) represents the compressive strength measured at the age of 28 days. The experimental values of Ec/√fc(28) for FRLWAC were between 2607 and 2713. When Ec/√fc(28) values were predicted for LWAC using the equation given in ACI 318–19, the predicted values ranged between 1959 and 2443; Ec = ρc0.043√fc(t), where ρc is the oven-dry density of the hardened concrete. When comparing the test results of FRLWAC with the predicted values of LWAC, we determined that Ec increased by approximately 11–33% because of steel fiber reinforcement, as reported in previous studies. The Ec/√fc(28) values of the Vf = 0.5% group were similar regardless of the fiber type (Fig. 13). However, when Vf = 0.5%, Ec/√fc(28) values of CSF(S)-1.0 and 1.5 were considerably higher than those of the deformed shapes. It is believed that the effect of geometrical deformation of the fiber on the slope of the elastic section of the stress–strain curve is relatively small. However, it can help improve the tensility and ductility of FRLWAC. It is possible to optimize the Ec value of FRLWAC through NLMR analysis (Fig. 13). This is more accurate for FRLWAC with a deformed shape:

$$E_{c} = 2609\exp \left[ {5.81 \cdot V_{f}^{2.4} \cdot S_{f}^{1.1} } \right]/f_{c} (28).$$
Fig. 13
figure 13

Regression analysis for normalized elasticity modulus of concrete.


The present study examined the effects of various steel fibers (conventional macro steel fibers with hooked ends (SF(H)) and copper-coated micro steel fibers (CSF)) on enhancing the mechanical properties of LWAC. The copper-coated micro steel fibers with straight, crimping, and hooked-end shapes were identified as CSF(S), CSF(C), and CSF(H), respectively. While mechanical properties of normal-weight concrete reinforced with the conventional macro steel fibers are commonly available, very few experimental studies have been conducted to examine the various properties of LWAC reinforced with copper-coated micro steel fibers. As a result, no formulations are available to assess the enhanced tensile resistance and toughness of micro steel fiber-reinforced LWAC. Although further test data are required to reliably assess the mechanical properties of micro steel fiber-reinforced LWAC, the following original observations are obtained:

  1. 1.

    Hooked-end steel fibers exhibited greater bond strength and less slip displacement with cement matrix than the straight and crimped steel fibers. In particular, the bond strength of hooked-end micro steel fibers was 15.4% higher than the counterpart macro steel fibers.

  2. 2.

    Straight microsteel fibers were slightly more favorable for preventing the workability degradation of LWAC than the other types of steel fibers at the same volume fraction.

  3. 3.

    The compressive strength development of LWAC was marginally affected by the type, shape, and volume fraction of fibers.

  4. 4.

    The deformed steel fibers were more effective than the straight fibers in enhancing the splitting tensile and flexural strengths of LWAC. Particularly, LWAC reinforced with CSF(H) exhibited higher flexural strength and flexural hardening response than the counterpart LWAC specimens with SF(H) or CSF(C).

  5. 5.

    The effect of various steel fibers on the enhancement of the splitting tensile and flexural strengths of LWAC could be formulated as a function of Vf, Sf, and τ, as expressed in the followings:\(f_{sp} = 1.45\left( {V_{f}^{1.2} \cdot S_{f}^{1.7} \cdot \tau^{0.6} } \right)^{0.26} \left( {f_{sp} } \right)_{N}\); \(f_{r} = 1.53\left( {V_{f}^{0.6} \cdot S_{f}^{0.4} \cdot \tau^{0.5} } \right)^{0.53} \left( {f_{r} } \right)_{N}\), where \(\left( {f_{sp} } \right)_{N}\) and \(\left( {f_{r} } \right)_{N}\) are the splitting tensile and flexural strengths of fiber-less LWAC.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Download references


This work was supported by the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) grant funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (Grant 22NANO-C156177-03)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The first author, KHY, planned and supervised the project, and reviewed this manuscript. The corresponding author, HYK, analyzed the data and wrote this manuscript. HJL performed the experiments and provided the experimental data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author’s information

K. H. Yang is a professor at Kyonggi University, South Korea. He received the Scientific Technician Medal for Most Meritorious Achievement in 2010 from the National Research Foundation of Korea. His recent research interests include the development of sustainable concrete materials and structural technology.

H. Y. Kim is a research professor at Kyonggi University, South Korea. He received his BE, MS, and PhD in the Department of Architecture Engineering at Dankook University. His research work includes the development of design models of sustainable concrete using various recycling materials.

H. J. Lee is a graduate student at Kyonggi University, South Korea. Her interest focuses on examining the mechanical properties of lightweight aggregate concrete.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hak-Young Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Journal information: ISSN 1976-0485 / eISSN 2234-1315

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, KH., Kim, HY. & Lee, HJ. Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Reinforced with Various Steel Fibers. Int J Concr Struct Mater 16, 48 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • fiber-reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete
  • steel fiber
  • bond stress
  • mechanical properties
  • regression analysis